Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / British English / August 2011



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"the reason therefor" vs. "the reason thereof"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John - 25 Aug 2011 17:08 GMT
Dear all:

Which of the following two sentences sounds better and clearer?

1. If X failed to prove that a formula in Y is valid, the reason thereof
was not visible.

2. If X failed to prove that a formula in Y is valid, the reason
therefor was not visible.

The intended meaning is the following:

If
  the computer program called X failed to derive a proof
  of a formula that was written in formalism called Y,
then
  it was unclear why the tool failed to derive the proof (maybe, no
proof exists, or the program is not powerful enough).

Any hints?

Thanks in advance
John
Einde O'Callaghan - 25 Aug 2011 18:28 GMT
> Dear all:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Any hints?

Both of them sound stilted - and indeed incorrect - to me. What's wrong
with saying plainly and simply: "... the reason for this was not
visible"  or even "... was unclear"?

Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
John Hall - 25 Aug 2011 19:33 GMT
>> Dear all:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>wrong with saying plainly and simply: "... the reason for this was
>not visible"  or even "... was unclear"?

Agreed. Another possibility is "the reason why was unclear".
Signature

John Hall
           "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick
            themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
                                           Winston S Churchill (1874-1965)

jaakov - 25 Aug 2011 20:07 GMT
>> Dear all:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> with saying plainly and simply: "... the reason for this was not
> visible" or even "... was unclear"?

Interesting... What grammatical rule would it break?
Einde O'Callaghan - 25 Aug 2011 21:25 GMT
>>> Dear all:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Interesting... What grammatical rule would it break?

"Therefor" and "thereof" are both very old-fashioned - indeed obsolete
in modern English - they sound very 16th century along with other
obsolete forms such as "thou", "thee", "thy" and "thine", "hath",
"hast", "he cometh not" etc.

While "therefor" could - at a push - be considered grammatically correct
because it's based on the preposition "for" (as in "reason for"),
"thereof" is definitely incorrect because "of" isn't the preposition
that goes with "reason" in modern English.

Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
John - 25 Aug 2011 21:45 GMT
>>>> Dear all:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> "thereof" is definitely incorrect because "of" isn't the preposition
> that goes with "reason" in modern English.

Great, thank you! Now how about "the reason why" vs. "the reason for
this" vs. "the reason for that", i.e.:

3. If X failed to prove that a formula in Y is valid, the reason why was
not visible.
4. If X failed to prove that a formula in Y is valid, the reason for
this was not visible.
5. If X failed to prove that a formula in Y is valid, the reason for
that was not visible.

John.
Einde O'Callaghan - 25 Aug 2011 22:02 GMT
>>>>> Dear all:
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> 5. If X failed to prove that a formula in Y is valid, the reason for
> that was not visible.

All of them sound OK to me. To a great extent whether you use "this" or
"that" would depend on the context.

Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
John - 25 Aug 2011 22:27 GMT
>> 3. If X failed to prove that a formula in Y is valid, the reason why was
>> not visible.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> All of them sound OK to me. To a great extent whether you use "this" or
> "that" would depend on the context.

I see. Wonderful, thanks!
John.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.