"Fair play" - new useage?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
C-Beeby - 15 Jan 2004 21:27 GMT I have noticed a new phrase has entered my vocabulary from TV in the last 3 months. It is "Fair play!", meaning "you have just made a reasonable point", "I agree with you", "I will do as you suggest" or "I concede the argument to you".
I thought this was a new phrase, but my husband disgrees. He says that he used to work with someone years ago who used "Fair play!" in this sense, but can give no other details. Is this a new phrase for the 21st century, or a long-established (perhaps regional) term that has just reached me through the media?
Regards,
Helen.
-- "It's the wrong trousers Gromit! And they've gone wrong!"
Phil C. - 16 Jan 2004 12:01 GMT >I have noticed a new phrase has entered my vocabulary from TV in the last 3 >months. It is "Fair play!", meaning "you have just made a reasonable point", [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >long-established (perhaps regional) term that has just reached me through >the media? That exact use for the expression isn't one I've particularly noticed - I'd tend to use "Fair enough or "Fair dos". I've used the latter verbally since a child and it suddenly occurs to me that I don't know how to spell it - "does" or "dos" aren't likely to suggest the appropriate pronunciation "dooz".
Digressing, Partridge reports that "It's a fair cop" goes back to late C19th. The Australian "Fair dinkum" seems to come from old Lincolnshire dialect.
 Signature Phil C.
Tony Mountifield - 16 Jan 2004 12:57 GMT > That exact use for the expression isn't one I've particularly noticed > - I'd tend to use "Fair enough or "Fair dos". I've used the latter > verbally since a child and it suddenly occurs to me that I don't know > how to spell it - "does" or "dos" aren't likely to suggest the > appropriate pronunciation "dooz". Is this a place where the greengrocer's apostrophe can be justified? "Fair do's".
Cheers, Tony
 Signature Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
David - 16 Jan 2004 15:36 GMT > > That exact use for the expression isn't one I've particularly > > noticed - I'd tend to use "Fair enough or "Fair dos". I've used the > > latter verbally since a child and it suddenly occurs to me that I > > don't know how to spell it - "does" or "dos" aren't likely to > > suggest the appropriate pronunciation "dooz".
> Is this a place where the greengrocer's apostrophe can be justified? > "Fair do's". According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", which is reserved for the third person.
 Signature http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/gay/99-0.htm A plenitude of noses gay, A merry nasal band.
Brian {Hamilton Kelly} - 18 Jan 2004 03:24 GMT > According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", which is > reserved for the third person. Ah yes; the buck stops here.
 Signature Brian {Hamilton Kelly} bhk@dsl.co.uk "We can no longer stand apart from Europe if we would. Yet we are untrained to mix with our neighbours, or even talk to them". George Macaulay Trevelyan, 1919
David - 18 Jan 2004 08:50 GMT > > According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", which > > is reserved for the third person.
> Ah yes; the buck stops here. I'll be glad when you stop fawning.
 Signature http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/photo/0y12-0.htm A Climb at Brimham Rocks This climb is booby-trapped
Tony Mountifield - 18 Jan 2004 08:54 GMT > > > According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", which > > > is reserved for the third person. > > > Ah yes; the buck stops here. > > I'll be glad when you stop fawning. Oh deer....
Tony
 Signature Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
David - 18 Jan 2004 09:13 GMT > > > > According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", > > > > which is reserved for the third person. > > > > > Ah yes; the buck stops here. > > > > I'll be glad when you stop fawning.
> Oh deer.... It's good to see the puns aren't falling on fallow ground.
 Signature http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/zodiac/7lib-0.htm Libra (September 24th - October 23rd) Images, Associations, Qualities, Careers, Health
Molly Mockford - 18 Jan 2004 09:19 GMT >> > > > According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", >> > > > which is reserved for the third person. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >It's good to see the puns aren't falling on fallow ground. I always get left be-hind :-(
 Signature Molly Mockford I think I've been too long on my own, but the little green goblin that lives under the sink says I'm OK - and he's never wrong, so I must be! (My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
David - 18 Jan 2004 14:54 GMT > >> > > > According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", > >> > > > which is reserved for the third person. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > > I always get left be-hind :-( Yes, we've all heard about you stag-gering along. ;-)
 Signature http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/zodiac/5leo-0.htm Leo (July 23rd - August 23rd) Images, Associations, Qualities, Careers, Health
Dr Robin Bignall - 18 Jan 2004 22:39 GMT >> >> > > > According to Chambers, yes, along with "dos" but not "does", >> >> > > > which is reserved for the third person. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Yes, we've all heard about you stag-gering along. ;-) We are not a-moosed.
 Signature wrmst rgrds Robin Bignall
Quiet part of Hertfordshire England
|
|
|