> > After writing, "You can judge the efficacy of that technique for
> > yourself," I wondered whether I should have used
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > with "efficacy," but it did with "efficaciousness." Is there any
> > reason for preferring one word over the other? TIA.
> Yes, too may people pronounce it e-FIC-acy.
The efficacy of your typing leaves something to be desired. As to the
word itself: it always makes me think of snake oil; why not use an
alternative? :- efficiency, adequacy, utility, ....

Signature
http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/free/
Free Software: !Jclean
- JPEG cleaner & transformer
Mike Bandy - 16 Apr 2004 16:13 GMT
>> > with "efficacy," but it did with "efficaciousness." Is there any
>> > reason for preferring one word over the other? TIA.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>word itself: it always makes me think of snake oil; why not use an
>alternative? :- efficiency, adequacy, utility, ....
Those words have different connotations. That's why I didn't use
"efficiency" or "effectiveness." I'd have used "adequacy" if I'd
have thought of it, but the meaning would've been different.

Signature
Mike Bandy