Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / British English / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"I'm 2 o'clock and he's 3 o'clock." -- facially nonsensical

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
T. Z. - 09 Jun 2004 22:30 GMT
A lady is late for 2 appointments, and finds
two guys waiting outside her office.
She apologizes and asks which is which.
One guy says:

(versions)
SIMPLE: "I'm 2 o'clock and he's 3 o'clock."
THE:    "I'm the 2 o'clock and he's the 3 o'clock."

HYBRID: "I'm 2 o'clock and he's the 3 o'clock."

> The SIMPLE-version seems more common than the
> THE-version.

THE-version would be preferred if she mistook the two
at first.

> In my mind, The SIMPLE-version is just sloppy
> English,
> and the THE-version is correct metonymy.

Are there similar utterances in other languages?

German: Ich bin ... und er ist ...
French: Je suis ... et il est ...

> Isn't it true that correct metonymy requires use of
> such "THE"?
> "the Crown"
> "Then the press descended on the scene."
> "The pen is mightier than the sword."
>
> BUT
> "Washington responded swiftly to the invasion."
> (which is ok; not a counter-example)

   
       
CyberCypher - 10 Jun 2004 01:19 GMT
T. Z. wrote on 09 Jun 2004:

> A lady is late for 2 appointments, and finds
> two guys waiting outside her office.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> German: Ich bin ... und er ist ...
> French: Je suis ... et il est ...

Japanese: Watashi wa ... de, kanojo wa ...

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor.
For email, replace numbers with English alphabet.

Chris Kern - 10 Jun 2004 12:08 GMT
>T. Z. wrote on 09 Jun 2004:

>> German: Ich bin ... und er ist ...
>> French: Je suis ... et il est ...
>
>Japanese: Watashi wa ... de, kanojo wa ...

I think that Japanese is grammatically different enough from English
that it's not quite the same -- because "wa" is a "topic marker",
saying "watashi wa neko" to mean "I like cats" (which can be done
given the appropriate conversational context, or at least I believe
so) creates a different structure than the equivalent English phrase.
Even "watashi wa neko desu" does little to change that because "desu"
has a rather vague meaning, particularly in recent casual speech where
people can say things like "wakaranai desu".

-Chris
Peter T. Daniels - 10 Jun 2004 02:44 GMT
> A lady is late for 2 appointments, and finds
> two guys waiting outside her office.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > The SIMPLE-version seems more common than the
> > THE-version.

Where could you be getting this? The "SIMPLE-version" is impossible.
Signature

Peter T. Daniels                       grammatim@att.net

Skitt - 10 Jun 2004 02:49 GMT

>> A lady is late for 2 appointments, and finds
>> two guys waiting outside her office.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Where could you be getting this? The "SIMPLE-version" is impossible.

Naah, not impossible, only rare.
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/  

John Atkinson - 10 Jun 2004 06:38 GMT
> > A lady is late for 2 appointments, and finds
> > two guys waiting outside her office.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Where could you be getting this? The "SIMPLE-version" is impossible.

Not to me.  I'd interpret the two versions a little differently:

"I'm the 2 o'clock, he's the 3 o'clock" would answer the question "Which of
you is which" if the answerer interpreted this to mean "Which of my (regular
hourly) appointments were each of you booked in for?" (Maybe she's a
psychoanalyst.)

"I'm 2 o'clock, he's 3 o'clock" would answer the same question, if the
answerer interpreted it to mean "What time was I supposed to see each of
you?"  (She doesn't have her whole day divided into a series of
appointments.  Maybe she's an engineer and they're salesmen, who rang her up
and told her they would be by at those times.)

No doubt one could think of a suitable scenario for the hybrid version too
...

John
Evan Kirshenbaum - 10 Jun 2004 16:52 GMT
>> A lady is late for 2 appointments, and finds
>> two guys waiting outside her office.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Where could you be getting this? The "SIMPLE-version" is impossible.

In this context, I pretty much agree.  If the context hadn't set up
the word "appopintment", though, it can work.  Say the one person is
speaking or manning a booth at two and the other at three.

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |Its like grasping the difference
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |between what one usually considers
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |a 'difficult' problem, and what
                                      |*is* a difficult problem. The day
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |one understands *why* counting all
   (650)857-7572                      |the molecules in the Universe isn't
                                      |difficult...there's the leap.
   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/        |                Tina Marie Holmboe

T. Z. - 11 Jun 2004 19:46 GMT
Thanks very much for the comments.

Could someone comment on this below?

> In my mind, The SIMPLE-version is just sloppy
> English,
> and the THE-version is correct metonymy.

________________________________

(versions)
SIMPLE: "I'm 2 o'clock and he's 3 o'clock."
THE:    "I'm the 2 o'clock and he's the 3 o'clock."

HYBRID: "I'm 2 o'clock and he's the 3 o'clock."

Are there similar utterances in other European
languages?

German: Ich bin ... und er ist ...
French: Je suis ... et il est ...

   
       
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.