
Signature
Peter Duncanson
UK
(posting from u.c.l.e)
At 13:54:10 on Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Peter Duncanson
<mail@peterduncanson.net> wrote in
<csiup0pfbkrfjja6i4ng3rjsipdb0olee4@4ax.com>:
>Enjoy analysing the use of sport(s) in the following examples (from a total
>of 170):
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the English Federation for Disability Sport and the Talented Athlete
>Scholarship Scheme.
If I read "sports for disabled people" I would think they were talking
about sports in which only disabled people participated. "Sport for
disabled people" sounds much more inclusive. But perhaps that's only
me.
>School sport flexes its muscles
>
>Schools playing fields are being redeveloped with new sports facilities and
>an initiative to get more pupils into sport is succeeding, according to
>figures out today
I see a distinction here between "sport" - the whole range of possible
activities - and "sports facilities", which implies facilities for a
certain, undefined, limited range of sports. Schools are likely to
offer football, and therefore make sure they have the facilities for it,
and unlikely to offer archery, providing no facilities for it. But some
schools will offer archery, and some may not offer football. The
wording allows for this.

Signature
Molly Mockford
I think I've been too long on my own, but the little green goblin that
lives under the sink says I'm OK - and he's never wrong, so I must be!
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)