Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / British English / June 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The word "Next"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
prnsk@lycos.co.uk - 14 Jun 2005 13:31 GMT
My wife & I regularly argue about the correct use of the word "NEXT".
My wife considers that if I refer to "next Friday" then it depends on
the week in which I make the comment. If I say it in the same week then
the word "next" must refer to the Friday of the following week but if I
made the statement on the preceeding Sunday then "next Friday" would be
the forthcoming Friday. Now I feel that next refers to the next item in
line irrespective of which week or whatever.

I would appreciate any guidance on this conundrum provided that we both
get a definitive answer that will resolve our argument.
Peter Duncanson - 14 Jun 2005 17:22 GMT
>My wife & I regularly argue about the correct use of the word "NEXT".
>My wife considers that if I refer to "next Friday" then it depends on
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I would appreciate any guidance on this conundrum provided that we both
>get a definitive answer that will resolve our argument.

I think you are most unlikely to have your argument resolved by any
suggestions here. There does not appear to be a definitive answer.

All I can suggest is that you restore domestic harmony by agreeing that the
head of the household should decide the correct usage of next. ;-)

Signature

Peter Duncanson
UK
(posting from u.c.l.e)

Bob Cunningham - 14 Jun 2005 19:45 GMT

> >My wife & I regularly argue about the correct use of the word "NEXT".
> >My wife considers that if I refer to "next Friday" then it depends on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> >the forthcoming Friday. Now I feel that next refers to the next item in
> >line irrespective of which week or whatever.

> >I would appreciate any guidance on this conundrum provided that we both
> >get a definitive answer that will resolve our argument.

> I think you are most unlikely to have your argument resolved by any
> suggestions here. There does not appear to be a definitive answer.

I think the definitive answer has already been given in
another response:  You have no choice but to recognize that
"next" is ambiguous, and both of you must make it a practice
to choose better wording, like "this coming Friday" or
"Friday the 24th".

I, for one, would never say "next Friday" and expect to be
certainly understood correctly.  

> All I can suggest is that you restore domestic harmony by agreeing that the
> head of the household should decide the correct usage of next. ;-)

That solution merely begets another problem: resolving who
is head of the household.

Meanwhile, I hope you won't be offended and will accept  it
in the helpful spirit in which it's intended if I tell you
that the correct spelling is "preceding".  Among otherwise
excellent spellers, it's possibly the most common error I've
seen.
Bob Cunningham - 15 Jun 2005 00:45 GMT
>  
> > >My wife & I regularly argue about the correct use of the word "NEXT".
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> excellent spellers, it's possibly the most common error I've
> seen.

[*] By "you" I meant, of course, the original poster, not
Peter Duncanson, the responder to the original poster.
Nick Wagg - 14 Jun 2005 17:58 GMT
> My wife & I regularly argue about the correct use of the word "NEXT".
> My wife considers that if I refer to "next Friday" then it depends on
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I would appreciate any guidance on this conundrum provided that we both
> get a definitive answer that will resolve our argument.

My wife and I differ in our understanding of the term too,
so we always try to disambiguate the situation by saying
Friday of next week, say, or this coming Friday.

Of course, "week" is a somewhat vague concept as there
is considerable disagreement over when it actually begins.
For centuries Sunday has been considered to be the first day
of the week, which is why Christians chose it as the day of rest,
to distinguish it from the Jewish Sabbath which is Saturday.

However, in our present secular world many people consider
Monday to be the first day of the week, as it's the first working
day, while the Radio Times seems to choose Saturday because
they don't want to split the weekend and it fits better with their
print runs that way. Quite what a Hindu or Muslim would
consider to be the beginning of the week is outside my ambit.

Maybe we should just stick to dates.
Matthew Huntbach - 15 Jun 2005 09:27 GMT
> <prnsk@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message

>> My wife & I regularly argue about the correct use of the word "NEXT".
>> My wife considers that if I refer to "next Friday" then it depends on
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> I would appreciate any guidance on this conundrum provided that we both
>> get a definitive answer that will resolve our argument.

> My wife and I differ in our understanding of the term too,
> so we always try to disambiguate the situation by saying
> Friday of next week, say, or this coming Friday.

Same here. It just seems to be one of those things. Maybe there's
a male-female difference is usage, so we will *always* differ with
our wives about it. Can anyone give a case where the male-female usage
is the other way round to the cited case?

Matthew Huntbach
Mike Barnes - 15 Jun 2005 09:55 GMT
In uk.culture.language.english, Nick Wagg wrote:
>> My wife & I regularly argue about the correct use of the word "NEXT".
>> My wife considers that if I refer to "next Friday" then it depends on
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>so we always try to disambiguate the situation by saying
>Friday of next week, say, or this coming Friday.

I'm surprised to hear you (and someone else in this thread, I think)
admitting this difference. In my household and circle of friends, "next
Friday" means the Friday of next week. No question about it.

>Of course, "week" is a somewhat vague concept as there
>is considerable disagreement over when it actually begins.

ISTM that there is no "actually" when it comes to which is the first day
of the week, and nothing worth disagreeing about. Context matters.

Signature

Mike Barnes

Paul Burke - 15 Jun 2005 12:33 GMT
> ISTM that there is no "actually" when it comes to which is the first day
> of the week, and nothing worth disagreeing about. Context matters.

OK which day IS the first day of the week then?

Paul Burke
Mike Barnes - 15 Jun 2005 13:03 GMT
In uk.culture.language.english, Paul Burke wrote:

>> ISTM that there is no "actually" when it comes to which is the first day
>> of the week, and nothing worth disagreeing about. Context matters.
>
>OK which day IS the first day of the week then?

I'm glad you asked me that. I'll tell you the answer when you tell me
what you mean by "the" week. There are lots of weeks to choose from.

Signature

Mike Barnes

Paul Burke - 15 Jun 2005 16:35 GMT
>> I'm glad you asked me that. I'll tell you the answer when you tell me
> what you mean by "the" week. There are lots of weeks to choose from.

Well, there must have been 'the' week in 1962 otherwise we couldn't have
had TW3. There's The Week in Westminster for the terminally bored. The
weekend is Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Tuesday (isn't it?). How
long is a plumber's week, as in "I'll be round in about three weeks"?

Paul Burke
John Briggs - 15 Jun 2005 17:31 GMT
>>> I'm glad you asked me that. I'll tell you the answer when you tell
>>> me
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> bored. The weekend is Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Tuesday
> (isn't it?).

I think it starts on Thursday.  But who was it who said that having a
meeting on Wednesday ruins two weekends?
Signature

John Briggs

Graeme Thomas - 15 Jun 2005 20:27 GMT
>>>> I'm glad you asked me that. I'll tell you the answer when you tell
>>>> me
>>> what you mean by "the" week. There are lots of weeks to choose from.

>I think it starts on Thursday.  But who was it who said that having a
>meeting on Wednesday ruins two weekends?

Jerome K Jerome, in _Three Men In A Boat_, said

       The trouble with working on Wednesdays is that it spoils both
       weekends.

But I think you can claim the credit for your version.
Signature

Graeme Thomas

Mike Barnes - 15 Jun 2005 19:43 GMT
In uk.culture.language.english, Paul Burke wrote:
>>> I'm glad you asked me that. I'll tell you the answer when you tell me
>> what you mean by "the" week. There are lots of weeks to choose from.
>
>Well, there must have been 'the' week in 1962 otherwise we couldn't
>have had TW3.

The first days of those weeks were presumably seven days before each
performance. Approximately. For all anyone cares.

> There's The Week in Westminster for the terminally bored.

Similar answer applies.

>The weekend is Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Tuesday (isn't
>it?).

What's Thursday done to offend you?

>How long is a plumber's week, as in "I'll be round in about three
>weeks"?

A string's-length.

Signature

Mike Barnes

John Briggs - 15 Jun 2005 13:06 GMT
>> ISTM that there is no "actually" when it comes to which is the first
>> day of the week, and nothing worth disagreeing about. Context
>> matters.
> OK which day IS the first day of the week then?

It depends on the context :-)
Signature

John Briggs

Brian {Hamilton Kelly} - 16 Jun 2005 01:44 GMT
On Wednesday, in article <3haiksFg78nnU1@individual.net>

> > ISTM that there is no "actually" when it comes to which is the first day
> > of the week, and nothing worth disagreeing about. Context matters.
>
> OK which day IS the first day of the week then?

You wouldn't need to ask that question, if you spoke Greek.  Their names
for Monday, ..., Thursday mean, literally, Second, ..., Fourth.  Friday,
Saturday, and Sunday fall outside this pattern.

Signature

Brian {Hamilton Kelly}                                     bhk@dsl.co.uk
        "Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu
        le loisir de la faire plus courte."
                            Blaise Pascal, /Lettres Provinciales/, 1657

Matti Lamprhey - 16 Jun 2005 08:51 GMT
"Brian {Hamilton Kelly}" <bhk@dsl.co.uk> wrote...

> > > ISTM that there is no "actually" when it comes to which is the
> > > first day of the week, and nothing worth disagreeing about.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> names for Monday, ..., Thursday mean, literally, Second, ..., Fourth.
> Friday, Saturday, and Sunday fall outside this pattern.

There's something not quite right with that.

Matti
Nick Wagg - 16 Jun 2005 08:59 GMT
> On Wednesday, in article <3haiksFg78nnU1@individual.net>
>
> You wouldn't need to ask that question, if you spoke Greek.  Their names
> for Monday, ..., Thursday mean, literally, Second, ..., Fourth.  Friday,
> Saturday, and Sunday fall outside this pattern.

Ahem.  If Monday is "Second", then shouldn't Thursday be "Fifth"?
Brian {Hamilton Kelly} - 16 Jun 2005 22:31 GMT
On Thursday, in article
    <d8rbh1$fqr$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>

> > On Wednesday, in article <3haiksFg78nnU1@individual.net>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Ahem.  If Monday is "Second", then shouldn't Thursday be "Fifth"?

Errm, yes.  The Greek names, transliterated into semi-phonetic English
are Dheftera, Triti, Tetarti, Pembti.  So if Monday==Second then Sunday
(Kyriaki==Lord's) must be the first day of the week.

For completeness, Saturday==Savvato~=Sabbath, and Friday==Paraskevi.
I've never worked out the etymology of that latter: no Helenophone will
tell me any meaning other than "Friday", although I have met it as a
[female] proper name[1].  At a guess, it might be something to do with
"against the hidden", although I've no concept of what that might imply.

[1] Hmm, circularity detected; if "Friday" can be a girl's name, so too
can "Thursday Next" (Jasper Ffoorde's heroine).

Signature

Brian {Hamilton Kelly}                                     bhk@dsl.co.uk
        "Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu
        le loisir de la faire plus courte."
                            Blaise Pascal, /Lettres Provinciales/, 1657

Molly Mockford - 17 Jun 2005 07:56 GMT
At 22:31:31 on Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Brian {Hamilton Kelly} <bhk@dsl.co.uk>
wrote in <20050616.2131.60251snz@dsl.co.uk>:

>For completeness, Saturday==Savvato~=Sabbath, and Friday==Paraskevi.
>I've never worked out the etymology of that latter: no Helenophone will
>tell me any meaning other than "Friday", although I have met it as a
>[female] proper name[1].  At a guess, it might be something to do with
>"against the hidden", although I've no concept of what that might imply.

Something to do with dress-down day?
:-)
Signature

Molly Mockford
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)

Nick Wagg - 17 Jun 2005 08:49 GMT
> On Thursday, in article
>
> [1] Hmm, circularity detected; if "Friday" can be a girl's name, so too
> can "Thursday Next" (Jasper Ffoorde's heroine).

Tuesday Weld?
Matthew Huntbach - 17 Jun 2005 09:26 GMT
>> My wife and I differ in our understanding of the term too,
>> so we always try to disambiguate the situation by saying
>> Friday of next week, say, or this coming Friday.

> I'm surprised to hear you (and someone else in this thread, I think)
> admitting this difference. In my household and circle of friends, "next
> Friday" means the Friday of next week. No question about it.

How can it possibly mean this? Surely it's far more logical for it
to mean "the next day that is a Friday". Although my wife disagrees ...

Matthew Huntbach
Mike Barnes - 17 Jun 2005 10:41 GMT
In uk.culture.language.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:

>>> My wife and I differ in our understanding of the term too,
>>> so we always try to disambiguate the situation by saying
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>How can it possibly mean this? Surely it's far more logical for it
>to mean "the next day that is a Friday".

Logical? This is *English* we're talking about, dammit.

>Although my wife disagrees ...

There's your answer.

Signature

Mike Barnes

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.