Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / British English / June 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

holiday/holidays/vacation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Arthur - 19 Jun 2005 20:05 GMT
Hello.

Could anyone please explain to me the difference in usage of "holiday" /
"holidays"?
And am I right that the word "vacation" is the American equivalent of
British "holiday(s)"?
Thank you!

Arthur
Molly Mockford - 19 Jun 2005 21:15 GMT
At 21:05:50 on Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Arthur <plc@postmark.net> wrote in
<emjte.3116$kP3.130@fe65.usenetserver.com>:

>Could anyone please explain to me the difference in usage of "holiday"
>/ "holidays"?
>And am I right that the word "vacation" is the American equivalent of
>British "holiday(s)"?

Yes, and the Americans say "holidays" where in the UK we say
"Christmas".
Signature

Molly Mockford
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)

Tony Mountifield - 19 Jun 2005 21:27 GMT
> Hello.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> British "holiday(s)"?
> Thank you!

In British English, people go "on holiday" when referring to a time of
recreation away from home, and this is indeed what the Americans call
going "on vacation".

"Holidays" (plural) is usually used to refer to periods of time, such as
the school holidays. I think in US English, "holidays" is most frequently
used to refer to the Christmas season (possibly including Thankgiving?),
where people will say "Happy Holidays" as a secular alternative to
"Happy Christmas".

In British English, you could also ask "how many holidays did you have
last year?", to which an answer might be "two: skiing in January and
sailing in July", for example.

I believe that the singular "holiday" in US English usually means
a public holiday, which in British English is called a "bank holiday",
i.e. a day when most businesses are closed.

Cheers
Tony
Signature

Tony Mountifield
Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

Dave Fawthrop - 19 Jun 2005 21:37 GMT
| I believe that the singular "holiday" in US English usually means
| a public holiday, which in British English is called a "bank holiday",
| i.e. a day when most businesses are closed.

Except the Supermarkets which open 1000 to 1600 hrs.

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

Arthur - 19 Jun 2005 22:01 GMT
> | I believe that the singular "holiday" in US English usually means
> | a public holiday, which in British English is called a "bank holiday",
> | i.e. a day when most businesses are closed.
>
> Except the Supermarkets which open 1000 to 1600 hrs.

Oh dear, oh dear......
And.... I always told my students something like the following to
explain the "bank holidays':
The banks close on certain weekends, so the shops close because thay
can't / couldn't take their money to the bank at the end of the day,
so... the supermarkets close etc... A kind of chain reaction....
I was wrong.... thank you for your explanation!

Arthur
Nick Wagg - 20 Jun 2005 09:40 GMT
> > | I believe that the singular "holiday" in US English usually means
> > | a public holiday, which in British English is called a "bank holiday",
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> so... the supermarkets close etc... A kind of chain reaction....
> I was wrong.... thank you for your explanation!

I think your explanation was correct in the 1960s but they times,
they are a-changing.

You may like to visit http://www.dti.gov.uk/er/bankhol.htm which
outlines some of the idiosyncratic ways in which bank holidays
are determined.
Matthew Huntbach - 20 Jun 2005 09:24 GMT
> | I believe that the singular "holiday" in US English usually means
> | a public holiday, which in British English is called a "bank holiday",
> | i.e. a day when most businesses are closed.

> Except the Supermarkets which open 1000 to 1600 hrs.

There is still a law, a remnant of the old Sunday Trading Law which
banned certain business altogether on Sundays, which says that
large retail stores may only open for 6 hours on a Sunday. The
six hours chosen tend to be 1000 to 1600 or 1000 to 1700.

The same law does not apply to Bank Holidays, however. Where I
am (London) it seems to be increasingly common that supermarkets
and the like remain open on Bank Holidays for as long as they would on
any other weekday.

Matthew Huntbach
Brian {Hamilton Kelly} - 20 Jun 2005 21:34 GMT
On Monday, in article
    <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506200919290.27769@frank.dcs.qmul.ac.uk>

> > Except the Supermarkets which open 1000 to 1600 hrs.
>
> There is still a law, a remnant of the old Sunday Trading Law which
> banned certain business altogether on Sundays, which says that

Errm, that's the *new* Sunday Trading Act (passed in 1994) which got rid
of all the anomalies with the old piecemeal legislation which applied to
shopping on Sundays.

> large retail stores may only open for 6 hours on a Sunday. The

Large meaning "of greater than 6000 sq ft trading area".

> six hours chosen tend to be 1000 to 1600 or 1000 to 1700.

ITYM 1100--1700.

> The same law does not apply to Bank Holidays, however. Where I
> am (London) it seems to be increasingly common that supermarkets
> and the like remain open on Bank Holidays for as long as they would on
> any other weekday.

Indeed; it's only the old-style retailers (and the banks, and anything
public-service, such as libraries) that close on Bank Holidays.

After all, it makes a lot of sense to provide a catchment mechanism for
all the wealth in the plastic of those whose employer has given a day
off.

The only time when a retailer MUST shut up shop entirely is on Easter Day
itself (and even then small shopkeepers are exempt).

Signature

Brian {Hamilton Kelly}                                     bhk@dsl.co.uk
        "Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu
        le loisir de la faire plus courte."
                            Blaise Pascal, /Lettres Provinciales/, 1657

Dave Fawthrop - 21 Jun 2005 07:43 GMT
| Indeed; it's only the old-style retailers (and the banks, and anything
| public-service, such as libraries) that close on Bank Holidays.
|
| After all, it makes a lot of sense to provide a catchment mechanism for
| all the wealth in the plastic of those whose employer has given a day
| off.

That is a *very* modern view of holidays, which has only been applicable
for 50, 100 or at the most 200 years.   The word was originally Holy Day
when the Church decreed that: According to the Bible one worked for 6 days
and had the seventh for rest.  There were also many Saints days and other
Feast days which were Holy, and so one did not work.   This makes seine
because he peasants needed time to attend church, tend the gardens look
after the pig, and other. Train at archery. etc. and generally have a rest,

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

Paul Burke - 21 Jun 2005 08:14 GMT
> Hamilton
> Kelly}) wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> That is a *very* modern view of holidays, which has only been applicable
> for 50, 100 or at the most 200 years.

Come off it, wakes weeks- people saved 51 weeks of the year to blue the
lot in a week at Blackpool for the mill girls, the Isle of Man for the
office clerks. That was a hundred and more years ago. 50 years ago was
1955, many people even had horseless carriages by then. 200 years isn't
modern- the possibilities of travel didn't exist before the railway
network- think Thomas Cook.

The 'modern' holiday has really taken the place of the fairs, which were
nothing if not commercial.

Paul Burke
Dave Fawthrop - 21 Jun 2005 08:59 GMT
| > Hamilton
| > Kelly}) wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
| > That is a *very* modern view of holidays, which has only been applicable
| > for 50, 100 or at the most 200 years.

Sorry that should have been 300 years.

| Come off it, wakes weeks- people saved 51 weeks of the year to blue the
| lot in a week at Blackpool for the mill girls, the Isle of Man for the
| office clerks. That was a hundred and more years ago. 50 years ago was
| 1955, many people even had horseless carriages by then. 200 years isn't
| modern- the possibilities of travel didn't exist before the railway
| network- think Thomas Cook.

Where I came from I remember two wakes weeks one for the Engineers and one
for the Woolen mills.

Wakes Weeks are  a relatively modern invention, which only make sense after
introduction of the Factory system by Arkwright in 1771 at Cromford Mill.
http://www.thepeakdistrict.info/fast/html/cromford_mill.html

| The 'modern' holiday has really taken the place of the fairs, which were
| nothing if not commercial.

Fairs were, and still are in country areas classed a _work_ by the farmers,
because they buy/bought livestock and other work necessities at fairs.  The
other things were incidental. Well, when not at home, one must drink and
eat, and chat to others about work. :-)   Only this year I bought some
agricultural 2 ft long Cable Ties at Masham at what is left of  a fair.

SOED lists an Anglo Saxon derivation for Holy Day.   For Holiday it has Old
English and Middle English derivations. It also gives usages for 1440, and
1526.  It also references each form to the other.

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

Paul Burke - 21 Jun 2005 11:23 GMT
> Wakes Weeks are  a relatively modern invention, which only make sense after
> introduction of the Factory system by Arkwright in 1771 at Cromford Mill.
> http://www.thepeakdistrict.info/fast/html/cromford_mill.html

Of course that's true, but as I was saying, anything before mass
transport was another world. Holidaying, in the sense of 'having time
off', was less tied to holy days after the Reformation(s). They were
virtually abolished during the Commonwealth period, and only restored
afterwards in a fairly attenuated form. That didn't stop people wanting
time off- if they could get it:

 I've waited longing for today:
Spindle, bobbin, and spool, away!
In joy and bliss I'm off to play
Upon this high holiday.

Spindle, bobbin, and spool, away,
For joy that it's a holiday!

The dirt upon the floor's unswept,
The fireplace isn't cleaned and kept,
I haven't cut the rushes yet
Upon this high holiday.

Spindle, bobbin, etc.

The cooking herbs I must fetch in,
And fix my kerchief under my chin.
Darling Jack, lend me a pin
To fix me well this holiday!

Spindle, bobbin, etc.

Now midday has almost come,
And all my chores are still not done
I'll clean my shoes till they become
Bright for a high holiday.

Spindle, bobbin, etc.

In pails the milk has got to go;
I ought to spread this bowl of dough -
It clogs my nails and fingers so
As I knead this holiday!

Spindle, bobbin, etc.

Handweavers and many other skilled artisans were condemned during the
period of their prosperity for taking time off when they felt like it-
to the millowners, one of the advantages of the new systemn was that the
lower orders were kept strictly disciplined.

The holiday in the sense of 'going away' is a democratisation of the
aristocratic enlightenement Grand Tour.

Paul Burke
John Briggs - 21 Jun 2005 18:12 GMT
> SOED lists an Anglo Saxon derivation for Holy Day.   For Holiday it
> has Old English and Middle English derivations. It also gives usages
> for 1440, and 1526.  It also references each form to the other.

Just out of interest, how do you distinguish between Anglo-Saxon and Old
English?
Signature

John Briggs

Paul Burke - 22 Jun 2005 08:26 GMT
> Just out of interest, how do you distinguish between Anglo-Saxon and Old
> English?

Old English developed from Anglo Saxon after the AS state was destroyed
by Billy the Bastard. Losing the conservative force of officially
sponsored scribes, the grammar and spelling simplified. So whereas the
AS Chronicle was written in grammatical AS at Peterborough up to King
Stephen's reign, most post- conquest writings are in the simplified
form, which we now call Old English or Early English. I suspect that the
spoken language in immediate pre- conquest times was closer to Old
English than high AS.

Paul Burke
John Briggs - 22 Jun 2005 12:30 GMT
>> Just out of interest, how do you distinguish between Anglo-Saxon and
>> Old English?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> English. I suspect that the spoken language in immediate pre-
> conquest times was closer to Old English than high AS.

Do you always post complete nonsense without thinking?
Signature

John Briggs

axel@white-eagle.invalid.uk - 22 Jun 2005 10:16 GMT
>> SOED lists an Anglo Saxon derivation for Holy Day.   For Holiday it
>> has Old English and Middle English derivations. It also gives usages
>> for 1440, and 1526.  It also references each form to the other.

> Just out of interest, how do you distinguish between Anglo-Saxon and Old
> English?

There isn't a distinction:

   "The oldest stage of English, from the earliest records (abput
   AD 700) to soon after the Norman Conquest, is now generally
   called 'Old English', though the name 'Anglo-Saxon' is still
   often used.
        -- Sweet's Anglo-Saxon primer

Axel
Mike Stevens - 22 Jun 2005 20:15 GMT
> The 'modern' holiday has really taken the place of the fairs, which
> were nothing if not commercial.

I don't agree with that.  I think the modern equivalents of the mdieval
fairs would be a mic=xture of shopping malls and emplyment agencies.

--
Mike Stevens
narrowboat Felis Catus II
Web site www.mike-stevens.co.uk
David - 23 Jun 2005 08:45 GMT
> > The 'modern' holiday has really taken the place of the fairs, which
> > were nothing if not commercial.

> I don't agree with that.  I think the modern equivalents of the
> mdieval fairs would be a mic=xture of shopping malls and emplyment
> agencies.

Mustn't forget that the word "fair" originally meant "holiday".

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/aureole/40-juice.htm
O-o-oh, the liquorice juice is running loose,
And the rhubarb skins' a-peeling...

Dave Fawthrop - 23 Jun 2005 09:04 GMT
| > > The 'modern' holiday has really taken the place of the fairs, which
| > > were nothing if not commercial.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
|
| Mustn't forget that the word "fair" originally meant "holiday".

SOED has -  A periodic gathering of buyers and sellers... cattle- horse-...

The recreational aspects of a fair undoubtedly existed, but were far from
paramount.  

If I were a farmer going to a fair, and bought or sold anything,
agriculture related, the Inland Revenue would allow mileage, food and drink
as business expenses.

The modern equivalent of a fair is a Trade Exhibition, for which I have had
reasonable expenses allowed by the Tax Man

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

David - 23 Jun 2005 16:02 GMT
> | Mustn't forget that the word "fair" originally meant "holiday".

> SOED has -  A periodic gathering of buyers and sellers... cattle-
> horse-...

> The recreational aspects of a fair undoubtedly existed, but were far
> from paramount.  

> If I were a farmer going to a fair, and bought or sold anything,
> agriculture related, the Inland Revenue would allow mileage, food and
> drink as business expenses.

> The modern equivalent of a fair is a Trade Exhibition, for which I
> have had reasonable expenses allowed by the Tax Man

Dave, I don't give a flying fig about the SOEDing definition, nor the
current tax aspects. I was merely pointing out that the word "fair"
originally meant "holiday" (Latin "feria", via OFr "feire"); and it
thus seems not unreasonable to assume that the various trading aspects
latched on to the the gathering for the celebration of the holiday,
rather than the other way about as seems to be being claimed by some in
the thread, not least your good self.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/ada/0a-0.htm
What exactly are meteor showers, and when is the best time to see them?

John Briggs - 23 Jun 2005 16:29 GMT
>>> Mustn't forget that the word "fair" originally meant "holiday".
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> rather than the other way about as seems to be being claimed by some
> in the thread, not least your good self.

I'm not convinced that "feria" existed as a singular word - except for
ecclesiastical use, where it means a day which is not a saint's day!
Signature

John Briggs

David - 23 Jun 2005 19:34 GMT
> I'm not convinced that "feria" existed as a singular word - except
> for ecclesiastical use, where it means a day which is not a saint's
> day!

I'll take your word for that use but the OED (& Chambers) does give
fair from Latin feria, holiday and I have to suppose the compilers
weren't just dashing it off in order to get away early that friday.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/colour/4r-0.htm
 Red Magic
Right Nostril of Nergal
Right Hand in the Shadow of Death

John Briggs - 23 Jun 2005 21:48 GMT
>> I'm not convinced that "feria" existed as a singular word - except
>> for ecclesiastical use, where it means a day which is not a saint's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> fair from Latin feria, holiday and I have to suppose the compilers
> weren't just dashing it off in order to get away early that friday.

feriae (f. pl.) means 'festivals, holidays'.  In Mediaeval Latin, "festum"
means a 'festival'.
Signature

John Briggs

Mike Stevens - 24 Jun 2005 06:36 GMT
>> I'm not convinced that "feria" existed as a singular word - except
>> for ecclesiastical use, where it means a day which is not a saint's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> fair from Latin feria, holiday and I have to suppose the compilers
> weren't just dashing it off in order to get away early that friday.

Yes, but if you read the definition as well, you see that OED gives the
prime meaning of "fair" as being a periodical gathering of buyers and
sellers, often with shows and entertainments.

And under "feria" OED gives two meanings, the ecclesiatical one and a
synonym of "fair".

--
Mike Stevens
narrowboat Felis Catus II
Web site www.mike-stevens.co.uk

No man is an island.  So is Man.
David - 24 Jun 2005 08:53 GMT
> > I'll take your word for that use but the OED (& Chambers) does give
> > fair from Latin feria, holiday and I have to suppose the compilers
> > weren't just dashing it off in order to get away early that friday.

> Yes, but if you read the definition as well, you see that OED gives
> the prime meaning of "fair" as being a periodical gathering of buyers
> and sellers, often with shows and entertainments.

Which is the current and historical meanings as far back as written
evidence exists; it does not, nor cannot, provide the evolution from
simple meaning of "holiday" to "trading opportunity" should that in
fact be the case.

> And under "feria" OED gives two meanings, the ecclesiatical one and a
> synonym of "fair".

Sorry, didn't realise the OED was a Latin Dic.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/
Where subtle shades of every hue, homogenize and mellow:
Pages cyan, green, and blue; and red, magenta, yellow.

Dave Fawthrop - 24 Jun 2005 09:48 GMT
| > > I'll take your word for that use but the OED (& Chambers) does give
| > > fair from Latin feria, holiday and I have to suppose the compilers
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
| simple meaning of "holiday" to "trading opportunity" should that in
| fact be the case.

The drift of meaning in English and its predecessors was the other way from
Trading opportunity to holiday/entertainment.

The trading opportunity meaning is alive and well.   Here is a list of 16
fairs at the NEC next year.  Some trade and others public.
http://www.necgroup.co.uk/visitor/whatson/SearchWhatsOn.asp?k=fair

Antiques for Everyone - The NEC Antiques Fair (Public)
The NEC 28 - 31 Jul 2005
Toy Collectors' Fair (Public)
The NEC 21 Aug 2005
Autumn Fair (Trade)
The NEC 4 - 7 Sep 2005
Symphony Organ Silent Movie: The Iron Mask
Symphony Hall 29 Sep 2005
Toy Collectors' Fair (Public)
The NEC 9 Oct 2005
Baby & Child International Fair (Trade)
The NEC 9 - 11 Oct 2005
Collect It! National Collectors' Fair (Public)
The NEC 22 - 23 Oct 2005
The Festive Gift Fair 2005 (Public)
The NEC 17 - 20 Nov 2005
Antiques for Everyone - The NEC Antiques Fair (Public)
The NEC 24 - 27 Nov 2005
National Christmas Lacemaker's Fair (Public)
The NEC 3 Dec 2005
Toy Collectors' Fair (Public)
The NEC 11 Dec 2005
National Fine Art and Antiques Fair (Public)
The NEC 18 - 22 Jan 2006
Spring Fair Birmingham 2006 (Trade)
The NEC 5 - 9 Feb 2006
Toy Collectors' Fair (Public)
The NEC 26 Feb 2006
British Travel Trade Fair (Trade)
The NEC 1 - 2 Mar 2006
Toy Collectors' Fair (Public)
The NEC 7 May 2006
<<<
   
Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

David - 24 Jun 2005 16:23 GMT
> | Which is the current and historical meanings as far back as written
> | evidence exists; it does not, nor cannot, provide the evolution
> | from simple meaning of "holiday" to "trading opportunity" should
> | that in fact be the case.

> The drift of meaning in English and its predecessors was the other
> way from Trading opportunity to holiday/entertainment.

> The trading opportunity meaning is alive and well.   Here is a list
> of 16 fairs at the NEC next year.  Some trade and others public.

[Snip]

Yes, of course, Dave. Bringing in all the so-called "fairs" held at the
NEC does prove beyond all doubt that some one and half millennia or so
ago, the denizens of backwater towns and villages across this land
began to be treated to trade exhibitions on which occasions, sometime
later, their employers granted them time off for merriment.

I'll state again: wherever you find honest endeavours to bring a bit of
R&R to yer common working folk by way of village fair, gala, show, or
whatever other name used, you'll find ice-cream vans, bouncy castles
and purveyors of shoddy souvenirs appearing as if by magic.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/quiz/20-0.htm
What starts and ends as a laugh but isn't funny?

axel@white-eagle.invalid.uk - 24 Jun 2005 17:03 GMT
> I'll state again: wherever you find honest endeavours to bring a bit of
> R&R to yer common working folk by way of village fair, gala, show, or
> whatever other name used, you'll find ice-cream vans, bouncy castles
> and purveyors of shoddy souvenirs appearing as if by magic.

There were few endeavours to grant relaxation time to the ordinary
peasant - quite frequently even the stipulated holidays laid down
by the Church were were not adhered to.

Fairs and markets were established purely for commercial reasons
- why pay for a licence unless a profit will be forthcoming. A
major consideration in granting such a licence was whether creating
a new market would harm an existing market - hardly a sign that
recreation was an aim rather than a side-effect of such an institution.

Axel
David - 24 Jun 2005 20:40 GMT
> > I'll state again: wherever you find honest endeavours to bring a
> > bit of R&R to yer common working folk by way of village fair, gala,
> > show, or whatever other name used, you'll find ice-cream vans,
> > bouncy castles and purveyors of shoddy souvenirs appearing as if by
> > magic.

> There were few endeavours to grant relaxation time to the ordinary
> peasant - quite frequently even the stipulated holidays laid down by
> the Church were were not adhered to.

> Fairs and markets were established purely for commercial reasons -
> why pay for a licence unless a profit will be forthcoming. A major
> consideration in granting such a licence was whether creating a new
> market would harm an existing market - hardly a sign that recreation
> was an aim rather than a side-effect of such an institution.
>  
That's as maybe but your answer still begs the question. I'm not
disputing that the primary purpose of markets (and super-markets called
"fairs") was to trade, I'm questioning whether or not you can state
categorically that some ancient "fairs" did not originate as local
pagan holidays where, alongside such gay events as the burning of
wicker-men, dancing round the maypole, playing hunt-the-cherry, etc.,
purveyors of roast squirrel and stuffed cod made their mark.

I've offered in support of my position the two facts that "fair"
derives through Old French from a Latin word with the meaning
"holiday", rather than "market", and that even today, local (or wider)
events intended to be primarily recreational usually attract quite a
number of traders and can, if not checked, turn into super-markets with
the entertainment being merely side-shows.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/colour/6y-0.htm
Say nothing on Sunday; contemplate this day the Golden Sun:
A Sulphurous Yellow Light - but false - that from Cold Night was Spun.

John Briggs - 24 Jun 2005 21:03 GMT
>>> I'll state again: wherever you find honest endeavours to bring a
>>> bit of R&R to yer common working folk by way of village fair, gala,
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> number of traders and can, if not checked, turn into super-markets
> with the entertainment being merely side-shows.

I do wonder if "feria" meaning 'ordinary day', was the day on which a market
might be held.
Signature

John Briggs

axel@white-eagle.invalid.uk - 24 Jun 2005 22:33 GMT
> I do wonder if "feria" meaning 'ordinary day', was the day on which a market
> might be held.

Markets were originally held on Sundays in the main, but under
ecclesiastical pressure were moved to weekdays by the early decades
of the 13th century.

Axel
Peter Duncanson - 24 Jun 2005 23:29 GMT
>> I do wonder if "feria" meaning 'ordinary day', was the day on which a market
>> might be held.
>
>Markets were originally held on Sundays in the main,

"in the main"? Were these fish markets?

>but under
>ecclesiastical pressure were moved to weekdays by the early decades
>of the 13th century.
>
>Axel

Signature

Peter Duncanson
UK
(posting from u.c.l.e)

Molly Mockford - 25 Jun 2005 00:31 GMT
At 23:29:30 on Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Peter Duncanson
<mail@peterduncanson.net> wrote in
<k82pb1p7asui03ihpg31s0r5bhqkl6o288@4ax.com>:

>>> I do wonder if "feria" meaning 'ordinary day', was the day on which
>>>a market
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>"in the main"? Were these fish markets?

Nice one.
Signature

Molly Mockford
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)

David - 25 Jun 2005 00:18 GMT
> I do wonder if "feria" meaning 'ordinary day', was the day on which a
> market might be held.

You might wonder that but aren't we discussing fairs which generally
are special events held on one day each year, not markets which occur
on one day (or more) each week. Fairs are not, even now, "ordinary
days".

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/wfolly/
The Wentworth Follies:
 Needle's Eye, Hoober Stand, Keppel's Column, Rockingham Mausoleum

John Briggs - 25 Jun 2005 00:46 GMT
>> I do wonder if "feria" meaning 'ordinary day', was the day on which a
>> market might be held.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> on one day (or more) each week. Fairs are not, even now, "ordinary
> days".

As the word (feire/faire) seems to have been adopted very late from OFr, you
do have to wonder what they were called before - or if the phenomenon simply
didn't exist.  It doesn't seem to occur much in place-names, for example
(except for field and streets).
Signature

John Briggs

David - 25 Jun 2005 09:18 GMT
> >> I do wonder if "feria" meaning 'ordinary day', was the day on
> >> which a market might be held.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > which occur on one day (or more) each week. Fairs are not, even
> > now, "ordinary days".

> As the word (feire/faire) seems to have been adopted very late from
> OFr, you do have to wonder what they were called before - or if the
> phenomenon simply didn't exist.  It doesn't seem to occur much in
> place-names, for example (except for field and streets).

Presumably we had a variety of Germanic and British terms for an
assortment of local periodic events, most of which involved a deal of
trading along with the remnants of pagan rituals (probably some events
which were, indeed, nothing but super-markets), which generally were
subsumed under the catch-all term "fair".

I did wonder about your emphasis on ecclesiastical "feria" as fair
coming through OFr "feire" suggests rather the possibility of an
original evolution of the meaning from "holiday" to "super-market"
either in classical Roman times or in post-Roman France, it them being
applied to similar trading events in Britain.

I still stand by my assertion that most old fairs (as opposed to Dave's
modern trade fairs at the NEC) are held on or about special days -
minor saints' days, important calendar days, etc. - and as such, it
seems more likely that traders were attracted to a local public
holiday, than that a local public holiday was invented because a
"super-market" happened to be taking place, much as, today, garden
centres and DIY stores time their major marketing efforts to Bank
Holidays, rather than Bank Holidays having been created so that the
public can visit these places.

"Fair" in street names is to be expected if the yearly event is always
held in the same place. We also have a lot of examples of "Market
Square", "Market Street", etc., in many places. "Market" as an element
in town names is quite common because the communities grew up around
the weekly market servicing local farms and hamlets in the area. It is
just about impossible to think of communities growing around the site
of an event held only on just one or on a few consecutive days each
year.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/photo/0y08-0.htm
Devil's Arrow at Boroughbridge

Paul Burke - 27 Jun 2005 09:01 GMT
> As the word (feire/faire) seems to have been adopted very late from OFr, you
> do have to wonder what they were called before - or if the phenomenon simply
> didn't exist.  It doesn't seem to occur much in place-names, for example
> (except for field and streets).

All those 'chipping', 'chip','cheap' and 'chep' names, related to
chapman (though not Keats), shopping, kaufen, and Copenhagen?

Paul Burke
John Briggs - 27 Jun 2005 13:23 GMT
>> As the word (feire/faire) seems to have been adopted very late from
>> OFr, you do have to wonder what they were called before - or if the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> All those 'chipping', 'chip','cheap' and 'chep' names, related to
> chapman (though not Keats), shopping, kaufen, and Copenhagen?

Exactly.  You have "Chipping" (also sometimes "Port"), and later "Market".
If you call it a "Fair", is it different?  If so, it must be a late
introduction.
Signature

John Briggs

Paul Burke - 27 Jun 2005 13:32 GMT
>>All those 'chipping', 'chip','cheap' and 'chep' names, related to
>>chapman (though not Keats), shopping, kaufen, and Copenhagen?

> Exactly.  You have "Chipping" (also sometimes "Port"), and later "Market".

But back to the function of 'fair', whatever you call it, as a holiday
in the modern sense. Point 1: the Polish national motto, a change of
occupation is as good as a rest. Big markets were infrequent (annual or
biennial) events. Point 2: most people would have rarely possessed much
of a float of cash, except when they had made a successful sale of
surplus goods or produce- at the market. Hence the gathering of CMOTs
and suchlike charlatans at such events, the holiday- type consumption,
the frivolous activities.

We are looking back here at an age when leisure was a luxury only
available to the very rich (and the very poor if the songs are to be
believed). The non- productive activities that separate the idea of
leisure from work would have to be snatched wherever available- such as
fairs and holy days. No vacations then- you didn't travel for fun.

Paul Burke
Dave Fawthrop - 25 Jun 2005 07:46 GMT
| You might wonder that but aren't we discussing fairs which generally
| are special events held on one day each year, not markets which occur
| on one day (or more) each week. Fairs are not, even now, "ordinary
| days".

But they are different from Holy Days, a phrase which still has a meaning,
to some Christians, if not the general populous.

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

David - 25 Jun 2005 09:32 GMT
> | You might wonder that but aren't we discussing fairs which
> | generally are special events held on one day each year, not markets
> | which occur on one day (or more) each week. Fairs are not, even
> | now, "ordinary days".

> But they are different from Holy Days, a phrase which still has a
> meaning, to some Christians, if not the general populous.

Dave, it may surprise you to hear this but Christianity is not the only
religion.

Anyway, such as Bank Holidays (and quarter days, etc.) are "holy days",
even if they aren't (all) Christian "Holy Days".

Also, check out "tawdry" (as ventured by John).

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/wfolly/3kc0-0.htm
Keppel's Column: The Eastern Door

Dave Fawthrop - 25 Jun 2005 10:10 GMT
| > | You might wonder that but aren't we discussing fairs which
| > | generally are special events held on one day each year, not markets
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
| Dave, it may surprise you to hear this but Christianity is not the only
| religion.

See sig, also I live in Bradford.

| Anyway, such as Bank Holidays (and quarter days, etc.) are "holy days",
| even if they aren't (all) Christian "Holy Days".

No they are secular, because they apply to those of all religions and non.

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk>
Chair, Bradford Curry Project  <bradfordcurryproject@hyphenologist.co.uk>
http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/bradfordcurryproject

David - 25 Jun 2005 11:37 GMT
> | Dave, it may surprise you to hear this but Christianity is not the
> | only religion.

> See sig, also I live in Bradford.

I've seen your sig; it doesn't say anything about religion unless
you're referring to the Holy Spirit as a mighty rushing wind. (I bet
webshots.com has some triffic snaps of it!)

> | Anyway, such as Bank Holidays (and quarter days, etc.) are "holy
> | days", even if they aren't (all) Christian "Holy Days".

> No they are secular, because they apply to those of all religions and
> non.

I was, of course, referring to the fundamental meaning of "holy" as
"set apart".

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/aureole/0-alien.htm
I shot a Bug-Eyed Monster,
With my Bug-Eyed Monster gun;

John Briggs - 25 Jun 2005 11:55 GMT
>>> You might wonder that but aren't we discussing fairs which
>>> generally are special events held on one day each year, not markets
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> But they are different from Holy Days, a phrase which still has a
>> meaning, to some Christians, if not the general populous.

Populace.  Which in this case *is* populous, and general (caviare to the
general...)

> Dave, it may surprise you to hear this but Christianity is not the
> only religion.
>
> Anyway, such as Bank Holidays (and quarter days, etc.) are "holy
> days", even if they aren't (all) Christian "Holy Days".

"The Feast of St Bank" :-)
Signature

John Briggs

David - 25 Jun 2005 17:36 GMT
> > Anyway, such as Bank Holidays (and quarter days, etc.) are "holy
> > days", even if they aren't (all) Christian "Holy Days".

> "The Feast of St Bank" :-)

Fair comment.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/ -- Dacha's Digital Domicile
http://www.grough.freeuk.com/j05.htm -- Light Plant Crossing

John Briggs - 24 Jun 2005 21:01 GMT
>>> Which is the current and historical meanings as far back as written
>>> evidence exists; it does not, nor cannot, provide the evolution
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> or whatever other name used, you'll find ice-cream vans, bouncy
> castles and purveyors of shoddy souvenirs appearing as if by magic.

Tawdry?
Signature

John Briggs

Brian {Hamilton Kelly} - 26 Jun 2005 02:51 GMT
On Friday, in article <4d80180e7adavid@dacha.freeuk.com>

> I'll state again: wherever you find honest endeavours to bring a bit of
> R&R to yer common working folk by way of village fair, gala, show, or
> whatever other name used, you'll find ice-cream vans, bouncy castles
> and purveyors of shoddy souvenirs appearing as if by magic.

Not to mention [the local equivalent of] CMOT Dibbler.

Signature

Brian {Hamilton Kelly}                                     bhk@dsl.co.uk
        "Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu
        le loisir de la faire plus courte."
                            Blaise Pascal, /Lettres Provinciales/, 1657

Brian {Hamilton Kelly} - 25 Jun 2005 19:25 GMT
On Friday, in article
    <aghnb1takul8cqpquoqgo0ek29gtvlev8a@4ax.com>

> The trading opportunity meaning is alive and well.   Here is a list of 16
> fairs at the NEC next year.  Some trade and others public.
[snip]
> Toy Collectors' Fair (Public)
> The NEC 9 Oct 2005
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The Festive Gift Fair 2005 (Public)
> The NEC 17 - 20 Nov 2005
[snip]

You seem to have missed the National Vintage Communications Fair on 30th
October?

Signature

Brian {Hamilton Kelly}                                     bhk@dsl.co.uk
        "Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu
        le loisir de la faire plus courte."
                            Blaise Pascal, /Lettres Provinciales/, 1657

Mike Stevens - 25 Jun 2005 21:51 GMT
>> And under "feria" OED gives two meanings, the ecclesiatical one and a
>> synonym of "fair".
>
> Sorry, didn't realise the OED was a Latin Dic.

"Feria" is not exclusively a Latin word.  It has a history of use in
English, which is what tyhe OED entry describes,

--
Mike Stevens
narrowboat Felis Catus II
Web site www.mike-stevens.co.uk

No man is an island.  So is Man.
David - 27 Jun 2005 09:10 GMT
> >> And under "feria" OED gives two meanings, the ecclesiatical one
> >> and a synonym of "fair".
> >
> > Sorry, didn't realise the OED was a Latin Dic.

> "Feria" is not exclusively a Latin word.  It has a history of use in
> English, which is what tyhe OED entry describes,

So it was just a red herring then? Unless you're saying that feria is
an English word which derives from OFr "feire", or an English use of a
Latin word to provide a Latin equivalent of "fair", neither of which
really helps in our quest to determine whether or not fair or its
ancestry originally meant "holiday" (with whatever connotation that
word had).

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/aureole/30-speak1.htm
Iron, Germanium & Squares within Squares

Einde O'Callaghan - 24 Jun 2005 13:43 GMT
>>>I'm not convinced that "feria" existed as a singular word - except
>>>for ecclesiastical use, where it means a day which is not a saint's
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> prime meaning of "fair" as being a periodical gathering of buyers and
> sellers, often with shows and entertainments.

This is, of course, the primary meaning today. But that doesn't mean
that it was always the primary meaning. There are numerous words in the
English language that derive from Latin but whose present meaning isn't
a translation of the original Latin root.

Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
Dave Fawthrop - 23 Jun 2005 17:12 GMT
| > | Mustn't forget that the word "fair" originally meant "holiday".
|
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
| rather than the other way about as seems to be being claimed by some in
| the thread, not least your good self.

Not all Latin words give rise to similar sounding Anglo Saxon/OE/ME/English
words with similar meanings.   This one appears to be a "false friend"

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

David - 23 Jun 2005 19:30 GMT
> | Dave, I don't give a flying fig about the SOEDing definition, nor
> | the current tax aspects. I was merely pointing out that the word
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> | of the holiday, rather than the other way about as seems to be
> | being claimed by some in the thread, not least your good self.

> Not all Latin words give rise to similar sounding Anglo
> Saxon/OE/ME/English words with similar meanings.   This one appears
> to be a "false friend"

Well, I wouldn't expect you to agree with the OED's etymology. What's
your source?

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/mavic/0m03-0.htm
Crackpot

Dave Fawthrop - 23 Jun 2005 19:42 GMT
| > | Dave, I don't give a flying fig about the SOEDing definition, nor
| > | the current tax aspects. I was merely pointing out that the word
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
| Well, I wouldn't expect you to agree with the OED's etymology. What's
| your source?

Kindly read what you quoted

Signature

Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> http://www.webshots.com 
Thousands of wonderful professional photos for your Wallpaper and
Screensaver. also 200,000 amateur pics. Four new pics each day.

David - 23 Jun 2005 19:51 GMT
> | > | Dave, I don't give a flying fig about the SOEDing definition,
> | > | nor the current tax aspects. I was merely pointing out that the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> | Well, I wouldn't expect you to agree with the OED's etymology.
> | What's your source?

> Kindly read what you quoted

Would I be correct in thinking that you suppose that although "fair"
might derive (through OFr "feire") from Latin "feria", the poor,
benighted Angles didn't have any time off and so used the same word to
mean "car boot sale" (for which activity they didn't have a word of
their own)?

Or do you mean that AS/OE/ME/English (phew!) "fair" just happens to
sound like it could derive from Latin "feria" but doesn't really?

Dave, you're not very clear and simply referring back to your previous
confusing (or confused? Since it's confusing, it's difficult to tell)
post doesn't really help.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/

Einde O'Callaghan - 23 Jun 2005 20:15 GMT
>>| > | Dave, I don't give a flying fig about the SOEDing definition,
>>| > | nor the current tax aspects. I was merely pointing out that the
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> confusing (or confused? Since it's confusing, it's difficult to tell)
> post doesn't really help.

Since the German word "Ferien" meaning holidays (and the first syllable
is pronounced the same as "fair") derives from the Latin "feriae"
meaning holidays and various English dictionaries, including those
already cited and teh Merriam-Webster, say that "fair" also derives from
"feriae" I think it's fairly safe to assume that this is the case.

Regards, Einde O'Callaghan
John Briggs - 23 Jun 2005 21:51 GMT
>>>> Mustn't forget that the word "fair" originally meant "holiday".
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Saxon/OE/ME/English words with similar meanings.   This one appears
> to be a "false friend"

And you are inventing non-existent languages - stop it!  The designations
are OE/ME/ModE.
Signature

John Briggs

axel@white-eagle.invalid.uk - 23 Jun 2005 21:29 GMT
> In article <pqqkb1pha3g54a3gl9kkqbeqshkt3aj9sv@4ax.com>, Dave Fawthrop

>> SOED has -  A periodic gathering of buyers and sellers... cattle-
>> horse-...

>> The recreational aspects of a fair undoubtedly existed, but were far
>> from paramount.  

>> If I were a farmer going to a fair, and bought or sold anything,
>> agriculture related, the Inland Revenue would allow mileage, food and
>> drink as business expenses.

>> The modern equivalent of a fair is a Trade Exhibition, for which I
>> have had reasonable expenses allowed by the Tax Man

> Dave, I don't give a flying fig about the SOEDing definition, nor the
> current tax aspects. I was merely pointing out that the word "fair"
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> rather than the other way about as seems to be being claimed by some in
> the thread, not least your good self.

Fairs were associated with religious festivals. They were usually
held annually and lasted several days (in contrast with local weekly
markets) attracting visitors from far afield. They were primarily
commercial events - they brought a profit to the landowner and
required a royal licence.

Fairs were certainly a break from routine since no other commercial
business was permitted within the local area for the duration of
a fair.

Axel



Mike Stevens - 24 Jun 2005 06:30 GMT
> Dave, I don't give a flying fig about the SOEDing definition, nor the
> current tax aspects. I was merely pointing out that the word "fair"
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> rather than the other way about as seems to be being claimed by some
> in the thread, not least your good self.

I'm not sure about that.  In ecclesiastical use the word "feria" means a day
which is neither a feast day nor a fast.

In the town where I grew up we had three annual fairs.  One of these was the
Sheep Fair which was exactly what the name suggests, a gathering for a few
days to buy & sell flocks of sheep.  This died out when the local farmers
decided that barley was a morfe profitable line than sheep.

The other two were  (and still are) known as Mop Fairs, and had originally
been hiring fairs, at which farm and domestic workers sought employment for
the cominmg year.  These were linked in the town's Charter (granted by King
John in the 13th Century) to the town's right to hold markets.  By the
middle-twentieth century (if not sooner) the Mop Fairs had become ordinary
fun-fairs.

I believe that fairs started out in medieval times as trading occasions,
bigger versions of the weekly markets, and the celebratory elements became
attached to them.

--
Mike Stevens
narrowboat Felis Catus II
Web site www.mike-stevens.co.uk

No man is an island.  So is Man.
David - 24 Jun 2005 08:59 GMT
[Snip]

> I believe that fairs started out in medieval times as trading
> occasions, bigger versions of the weekly markets, and the celebratory
> elements became attached to them.

And no doubt the Temple in Jerusalem started out as a bureau de
change... ;-)

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/ada/0b-0.htm
...beneath the Masonic pyramid is the legend NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM...

Phil C. - 23 Jun 2005 16:27 GMT
>> > The 'modern' holiday has really taken the place of the fairs, which
>> > were nothing if not commercial.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Mustn't forget that the word "fair" originally meant "holiday".

Then there's "fayre". I've never been sure whether that's a genuine
alternative form or just an "olde worlde" spelling made up for effect.
I always want to pronounce it fay-ree.
According to
<http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutspelling/fayre>
it is genuinely old but now used to lend "an historick flavour" to
both "fair" and "fare".
Signature

Phil C.

Matthew Huntbach - 21 Jun 2005 10:02 GMT
>> There is still a law, a remnant of the old Sunday Trading Law which
>> banned certain business altogether on Sundays, which says that

> Errm, that's the *new* Sunday Trading Act (passed in 1994) which got rid
> of all the anomalies with the old piecemeal legislation which applied to
> shopping on Sundays.

Yes, that's what I meant. There were once very extensive
restrictions on trading on Sundays. The fact that there are
still some restrictions is a remnant of the idea, enshrined
in older legislation, that any non essential work should
be banned on Sundays.

>> six hours chosen tend to be 1000 to 1600 or 1000 to 1700.

> ITYM 1100--1700.

Yes, must have mis-typed.

Matthew Huntbach
sum1 - 20 Jun 2005 19:30 GMT
tony@softins.clara.co.uk wrote:

> > Hello.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> where people will say "Happy Holidays" as a secular alternative to
> "Happy Christmas".

Not just these two.    I hear people - bank tellers, counter clerks/shop
assistants, etc - here routinely saying "have a great holiday',
and 'y'all have a great holiday now!', a few days before almost any national
holiday.  Of which, I might add, there seem to be an excessive
number in the calendar!

> I believe that the singular "holiday" in US English usually means
> a public holiday, which in British English is called a "bank holiday",
> i.e. a day when most businesses are closed.
>
> Cheers
> Tony

Right:  I find "Bank Holiday" is never used here.
Most non-government businesses, food stores (supermarkets), department stores,
even banks are open on some or all  of the national holidays.  Thanksgiving Day
(the 4th Thursday in November I think it falls on), the 4th of July,
and Christmas Day are the ones  almost everyone likes  to have off.
--
Ian
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.