> > At 20:55:58 on Wed, 14 Sep 2005, John Briggs
> > <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com> wrote in
> > <y70We.18015$Aa1.9642@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net>:
> >>> It reads like modern gobbledygook to me. "Envisaged" doesn't make
> >>> any sense and there ought to be a "will" before "endeavour". I'm
> >>> sure that a council employee in 1910 would have produced something
> >>> more comprehensible.
> >> And wouldn't have said "it will be progressed."
> > I suspect that around 1910 the passive voice would have ruled supreme.
> > "In reference to your letter of the 10th inst., the subject matter has
> > been noted and will receive our attention."
>
> Yes, of course - but it was "progress" as a verb that I was objecting to.
There's nothing wrong with using "progress" as a verb, as in
"The work is progressing nicely".
I suspect that what you really had in mind is an objection
to using "progress" as a transitive verb. Surprising to
see, though, the _New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary_ has
the following definition of the verb "progress":
4 v.t. Cause (a situation, condition, etc.) to move
forward or improve; cause (work etc.) to proceed
towards completion; spec. (US) secure the passage of
(a bill) through a legislative body. E19.
They give the following examples for that meaning:
4 _Marxism Today_ To progress the possibility of
women being represented.
_Landscape_ Every endeavour will be made to
progress your interest.
_Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary_ has
progress
transitive verb
[...]
2 : to cause to progress : push forward :
ADVANCE <a really big housing program cannot
be successfully progressed _Americana Annual_>