Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / British English / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"endeavour to have the matter further envisaged" - what date would you guess ???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rab C Nesbitt - BT - 14 Sep 2005 20:42 GMT
Must share this - I have (really, really) just received a letter dated th
Sept 2005 from my local council which contains the expression
"
we endeavour to have the matter further envisaged.
"

Fuller context is
"
Thank you for pointing out this apparent anomaly and we endeavour to have
the matter further envisaged. Unfortunately, this may take some time but it
will be progressed.

"

What date would the assembled experts have guessed for such wording??? I
would have started 1910-ish, but having been 30 years in Computing am
ignorant on these matters: any guesses or references ??

Yours aye

Rab
John Hall - 14 Sep 2005 20:49 GMT
>Must share this - I have (really, really) just received a letter dated th
>Sept 2005 from my local council which contains the expression
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>would have started 1910-ish, but having been 30 years in Computing am
>ignorant on these matters: any guesses or references ??

It reads like modern gobbledygook to me. "Envisaged" doesn't make any
sense and there ought to be a "will" before "endeavour". I'm sure that a
council employee in 1910 would have produced something more
comprehensible.
Signature

John Hall
               "Home is heaven and orgies are vile,
                But you *need* an orgy, once in a while."
                                              Ogden Nash (1902-1971)

John Briggs - 14 Sep 2005 21:55 GMT
>> Must share this - I have (really, really) just received a letter
>> dated th Sept 2005 from my local council which contains the
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> that a council employee in 1910 would have produced something more
> comprehensible.

And wouldn't have said "it will be progressed."
Signature

John Briggs

Molly Mockford - 14 Sep 2005 22:07 GMT
At 20:55:58 on Wed, 14 Sep 2005, John Briggs <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com>
wrote in <y70We.18015$Aa1.9642@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net>:

>> It reads like modern gobbledygook to me. "Envisaged" doesn't make any
>> sense and there ought to be a "will" before "endeavour". I'm sure
>> that a council employee in 1910 would have produced something more
>> comprehensible.
>
>And wouldn't have said "it will be progressed."

I suspect that around 1910 the passive voice would have ruled supreme.

"In reference to your letter of the 10th inst., the subject matter has
been noted and will receive our attention."

There would have been no advance apologies for delays - nobody would
have expected instant action anyway.

(And yes, I was - many decades ago - taught the usage of inst., ult. and
even prox.  For those who weren't, they stand for "this month", "last
month" and "next month".)
Signature

Molly Mockford
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)

John Briggs - 14 Sep 2005 23:43 GMT
> At 20:55:58 on Wed, 14 Sep 2005, John Briggs
> <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com> wrote in
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> "In reference to your letter of the 10th inst., the subject matter has
> been noted and will receive our attention."

Yes, of course - but it was "progress" as a verb that I was objecting to.
Signature

John Briggs

Bob Cunningham - 15 Sep 2005 00:00 GMT
> > At 20:55:58 on Wed, 14 Sep 2005, John Briggs
> > <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com> wrote in
> > <y70We.18015$Aa1.9642@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net>:

> >>> It reads like modern gobbledygook to me. "Envisaged" doesn't make
> >>> any sense and there ought to be a "will" before "endeavour". I'm
> >>> sure that a council employee in 1910 would have produced something
> >>> more comprehensible.

> >> And wouldn't have said "it will be progressed."

> > I suspect that around 1910 the passive voice would have ruled supreme.

> > "In reference to your letter of the 10th inst., the subject matter has
> > been noted and will receive our attention."
>
> Yes, of course - but it was "progress" as a verb that I was objecting to.

There's nothing wrong with using "progress" as a verb, as in
"The work is progressing nicely".

I suspect that what you really had in mind is an objection
to using "progress" as a transitive verb.  Surprising to
see, though, the _New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary_ has
the following definition of the verb "progress":

   4 v.t. Cause (a situation, condition, etc.) to move
   forward or improve; cause (work etc.) to proceed
   towards completion; spec. (US) secure the passage of
   (a bill) through a legislative body. E19.

They give the following examples for that meaning:

  4 _Marxism Today_ To progress the possibility of
  women being represented.

  _Landscape_ Every endeavour will be made to
  progress your interest.

_Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary_ has

  progress
  transitive verb  
  [...]
  2 : to cause to progress : push forward :
  ADVANCE <a really big housing program cannot
  be successfully progressed _Americana Annual_>
John of Aix - 14 Sep 2005 22:54 GMT
>> Must share this - I have (really, really) just received a letter
>> dated th Sept 2005 from my local council which contains the
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> that a council employee in 1910 would have produced something more
> comprehensible.

Modern gobbledygook for me too, and 'progressed' is not used in this
sense except by wafflers without knowledge, of the type that seems to
have written the notice.
Bob Cunningham - 14 Sep 2005 21:15 GMT
> Must share this - I have (really, really) just
> received a letter dated th Sept 2005 from my
> local council which contains the expression

> "we will endeavour to have the matter further
> envisaged."
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> in Computing am ignorant on these matters:
> any guesses or references ??

I strongly doubt that any English user of any century would
have used English those ways.  I suspect the text was
written by a non-native English speaker whose English usage
was still far from acceptable.
Rab C Nesbitt - BT - 15 Sep 2005 08:53 GMT
>> Must share this - I have (really, really) just
>> received a letter dated th Sept 2005 from my
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> written by a non-native English speaker whose English usage
> was still far from acceptable.

!! You may be right:  It is possible this was written by a native Gaelic
speaker (being from Highlands of Scotland..).  The "Manager" speaks with a
strong West-Highland accent, his assistant who e-mailed the letter (and I
guess probably wrote it..) is a xxx MxYyyyy....
David - 14 Sep 2005 22:41 GMT
> Must share this - I have (really, really) just received a letter
> dated th Sept 2005 from my local council which contains the
> expression " we endeavour to have the matter further envisaged. "

Obviously the writer thought "we are trying to find someone to look
into the matter" too plain.

Signature

http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/penny/1d-01.htm
Ayesha uttered a little Turkish yelp then upped her
voluminous skirts and downed her voluminous knickers

Molly Mockford - 14 Sep 2005 23:16 GMT
At 21:41:48 on Wed, 14 Sep 2005, David <david@dacha.freeuk.com> wrote in
<4daa7520a7david@dacha.freeuk.com>:

>> Must share this - I have (really, really) just received a letter
>> dated th Sept 2005 from my local council which contains the
>> expression " we endeavour to have the matter further envisaged. "
>
>Obviously the writer thought "we are trying to find someone to look
>into the matter" too plain.

It's just occurred to me that "envisaged" is probably a spell-checker's
substitution for an incorrectly-spelled "investigated".
Signature

Molly Mockford
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)

Giles Todd - 14 Sep 2005 23:40 GMT
> Thank you for pointing out this apparent anomaly and we endeavour to have
> the matter further envisaged. Unfortunately, this may take some time but it
> will be progressed.

Sounds to me like modern management-speak, with helpful input from the
Legal, Marketing and Human Resources departments.

Giles
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.