>'Vintage' literaly means 'of a certain year'. A vintage botlle of wine
>can be from 1806 or 2006. Age does not come into it. However theword is
>often used (wrongly IMO) to mean 'old' or that seems old and this is the
>use with clothes. It means they look old so when you buy something new
>you pay extra to get it looking worn out. Isn't capitalism wondeful?
>> 'Vintage' literaly means 'of a certain year'. A vintage botlle of
>> wine can be from 1806 or 2006. Age does not come into it. However
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> year they were Veteran. If newer, but still old, they were Vintage.
> (Or vice versa.)
IIRC these were defined by the relevant organisations of enthusiasts. The
Veteran Car Club defined "veteran" cars as those built before the abolition
of the red flag in something like 1904. The Vintage Sports Car Club defined
"vintage" as being from then up to 1930, but accepted selected makes of car
after that date as "post-vintage thoroughbreds".
--
Mike Stevens
narrowboat Felis Catus III
web site www.mike-stevens.co.uk
No man is an island. So is Man.
>> 'Vintage' literaly means 'of a certain year'. A vintage botlle of
>> wine can be from 1806 or 2006. Age does not come into it. However
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I don't know how old the term "bygones" is but I've never liked it
> since I first heard it.
Bygones in what sense? In the sense of 'bygones' like 'not really
antiques, just old things'? If yes then I cant' say I'm much of a fan
either. The French have the word 'brocante' for that section of the old
stuff market but real antiques are something else, 'antiquités', so I
suppose there is a need for an equivalent in English.
Otherwise I only know this word in the phrase "let bygones be bygones"
(whose antiquity I do not know).
As to 'vintage' and 'veteran': Mike Stevens explains it nicely. However
for 'antique', I have a vague memory that it was 103 years (or perhaps
101) that brought qualification. It was the odd figure that struck me
when I heard it, a very long time ago so I may well be wrong. Anybody?
Phil C. - 17 Feb 2006 16:56 GMT
>> I don't know how old the term "bygones" is but I've never liked it
>> since I first heard it.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>stuff market but real antiques are something else, 'antiquités', so I
>suppose there is a need for an equivalent in English.
Yes - I meant the the first use above. I assume it was invented to
avoid using the word "antiques". I have heard it given a wider
application such as for displays of implements from days gone by. I
agree that it can be quite useful. I'm not sure why I don't like it -
perhaps because it sounds like a word coined by dealers to avoid
breaching the Trades Descriptions Act.

Signature
Phil C.
Phil C. - 17 Feb 2006 17:21 GMT
>However
>for 'antique', I have a vague memory that it was 103 years (or perhaps
>101) that brought qualification. It was the odd figure that struck me
>when I heard it, a very long time ago so I may well be wrong. Anybody?
<http://www.startups.co.uk/Antique_business.YeGTzcRoS63Ijg.html>
<<Ford "the definition was objects 100 years old or older or an
arbitrary dateline like 1756, at one point Antique fairs would prevent
dealers from exhibiting if they sold objects younger than an arbitrary
dateline you now no longer have datelines at antique fairs".>>
Looking more internationally. Wikipedia (so it must be true) suggests
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiques>
<<The definition of antique varies from source to source, product to
product and year to year. But, there are some time tested definitions
of antique for you to consider... An item which is at least 75 years
old and is collected or desirable due to rarity, condition, utility,
or some other unique feature. Cars for example are considered antiques
in the U.S. if they are older than 25 years...>>
So it looks rather vague.

Signature
Phil C.
John of Aix - 17 Feb 2006 20:27 GMT
>> However
>> for 'antique', I have a vague memory that it was 103 years (or
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> dealers from exhibiting if they sold objects younger than an arbitrary
> dateline you now no longer have datelines at antique fairs".>>
Thanks. I prefer this one. It was defintely at least a century among
ther 'real' antique dealers wehn I was young.
> Looking more internationally. Wikipedia (so it must be true) suggests
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> So it looks rather vague.
I'll take the hundred (at least) arbitrary though it is. It gives a
certain gravitas to the thing. It's all tosh anyway really. You like it,
you want it, you buy it, thats fine, or think it is 'that old stuff' (as
a US American friend once described the priceless antiques in her
parents' home to me) that's fine too.