Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / British English / May 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Unanimously

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John A. Green - 11 May 2006 16:38 GMT
I received the minutes of a meeting that contained the clause:
"Everyone agreed unanimously."

I think this sounds odd.
I suppose it's all right if "unanimously" means "with one mind"; but
it is usually taken to mean "with agreement of all", isn't it?
Perhaps it's the "everyone" that makes it sound wrong, can one be
unanimous individually?
Any comments on:
1) It was agreed unanimously.
2) We agreed unanimously.
3) Everone agreed unanimously.
?

John

**Replies to <u04jag@lineone.net> have a 1Kb maximum filter.
Please ask for alternate address if you wish directly to reply,
include a + in the subject line.**

Signature

John A Green
Leigh (Lancashire) or Aberdeen

Nick Wagg - 11 May 2006 17:12 GMT
>I received the minutes of a meeting that contained the clause:
> "Everyone agreed unanimously."
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> 2) We agreed unanimously.
> 3) Everone agreed unanimously.

It's a tautology. If you are unanimous, you must be in (complete) agreement.
It's enough to say "Everyone was unanimous" or "The meeting was unanimous".
Ivan - 11 May 2006 18:17 GMT
> >I received the minutes of a meeting that contained the clause:
> > "Everyone agreed unanimously."
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> It's a tautology. If you are unanimous, you must be in (complete) agreement.
> It's enough to say "Everyone was unanimous" or "The meeting was unanimous".

And I am unanimous in that!
- Mrs. Slocombe
Joseph Littleshoes - 11 May 2006 23:53 GMT
>>>I received the minutes of a meeting that contained the clause:
>>>"Everyone agreed unanimously."
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> And I am unanimous in that!
> - Mrs. Slocombe

Reminds me of the line in the Mel Brookes film "To be or not to be"
where in the 2 Polish stars of the stage are described as being 'world
famous locally."
---
JL
John Hall - 11 May 2006 18:36 GMT
>Any comments on:
>1) It was agreed unanimously.
>2) We agreed unanimously.
>3) Everone agreed unanimously.

I think either of the first two are fine. So would be: "Everyone
agreed." But your number 3 is tautologous.
Signature

John Hall     "Do you have cornflakes in America?"
             "Well, actually, they're American."
     "So what brings you to Britain then if you have cornflakes already?"
                                 Bill Bryson: "Notes from a Small Island"

John of Aix - 11 May 2006 18:57 GMT
> I received the minutes of a meeting that contained the clause:
> "Everyone agreed unanimously."
>
> I think this sounds odd.

It is wrong, tautology, full stop.
John A. Green - 13 May 2006 14:07 GMT
>> I received the minutes of a meeting that contained the clause:
>> "Everyone agreed unanimously."
>>
>> I think this sounds odd.
>
>It is wrong, tautology, full stop.

But is tautology always invariably wrong?  :-)

Do you all everone disgaree unanimously?
John

**Replies to <u04jag@lineone.net> have a 1Kb maximum filter.
Please ask for alternate address if you wish directly to reply,
include a + in the subject line.**

Signature

John A Green
Leigh (Lancashire) or Aberdeen

John Briggs - 13 May 2006 14:44 GMT
>>> I received the minutes of a meeting that contained the clause:
>>> "Everyone agreed unanimously."
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Do you all everone disgaree unanimously?

'Disgaree' - there's a word that ought to exist :-)

['Everone' is a brand name for testosterone - now there's a thought :-)]
Signature

John Briggs

John A. Green - 13 May 2006 17:01 GMT
On Sat, 13 May 2006 13:07:11 GMT, I wrote:

>Do you all everone disgaree unanimously?

No, I don't know what I meant either.

Possibly "Do you all disagree unanimously?",
but I managed to write even more nonsense than intended.

Sorry, must stick to the rule of reading before sending.
John

**Replies to <u04jag@lineone.net> have a 1Kb maximum filter.
Please ask for alternate address if you wish directly to reply,
include a + in the subject line.**

Signature

John A Green
Leigh (Lancashire) or Aberdeen

David - 13 May 2006 17:30 GMT
> On Sat, 13 May 2006 13:07:11 GMT, I wrote:

> >Do you all everone disgaree unanimously?

>  No, I don't know what I meant either.

> Possibly "Do you all disagree unanimously?",
> but I managed to write even more nonsense than intended.

> Sorry, must stick to the rule of reading before sending.

What? And spoil all the fun!

Signature

David - toro-danyo atcost uku fullstop co fullstop uk
http://www.toro-danyo.uku.co.uk/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.