> I love reading your vitriolic messages to the grammatically unsure.
> They really brighten up my day.
|The grammatically unsure usually get a warm and cordial welcome here,
|unless they try to insist to educated native English speakers that their
|idisyncrasy is standard and that everyone else is wrong.
But it is fine for:
"Educated native English speakers" "to insist" "that their idisyncrasy is
standard and that everyone else is wrong."
Hmmmmmm

Signature
Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.
Einde O'Callaghan - 23 Aug 2006 22:18 GMT
Dave Fawthrop schrieb:
> |The grammatically unsure usually get a warm and cordial welcome here,
> |unless they try to insist to educated native English speakers that their
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "Educated native English speakers" "to insist" "that their idisyncrasy is
> standard and that everyone else is wrong."
Some of us here are English-language teaching professionals who work
with the lan guage and help non-native speakers to achieve a better
grasp of our not uncomplicated native language. We have studied the way
the language functions and are usually well aware of the important
differences between the main varieties of the language and the different
levels of formality. This means that the opinions we express about
language and usage aren't simply personal idiosyncrasies, even if we may
sometimes have differences of opinion on the appropriateness of a
particular usage - this is often a generational thing or the result of
the ongoing dispute about descriptive vs. prescriptive grammar.
Einde O'Callaghan