You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Weather Forecast Percentages
John Varela
03 Jul 2009 19:17
> This recent one was fairly spectacular: > > http://io9.com/5306026/did-this-jellyfish-crop-circle-accurately-predict-a-solar -storm
Crop circles make me feel great, too. I'm glad to see that they are not only continuing but improving.
Signature
John Varela Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email
LFS
03 Jul 2009 06:46
>>>> I just remembered a classic bit of weather jargon I heard on the >>>> radio: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > circles, I haven't heard anything about them for quite a while. Did > all of the pranksters get tired of the joke?
> >> I just remembered a classic bit of weather jargon I heard on the > >> radio: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > One very recent example of that: > http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/22/2604222.htm
Evidently no one has actually seen the animals falling from the sky. What has happened is that fish and tadpoles have been observed in unexpected places.
I'm suspecting hoaxers a la the crop circles. Speaking of crop circles, I haven't heard anything about them for quite a while. Did all of the pranksters get tired of the joke?
Signature
John Varela Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email
John Holmes
02 Jul 2009 12:44
>> I just remembered a classic bit of weather jargon I heard on the >> radio: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raining_animals
One very recent example of that: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/22/2604222.htm
Signature
Regards John for mail: my initials plus a u e at tpg dot com dot au
Evan Kirshenbaum
02 Jul 2009 06:16
> I just remembered a classic bit of weather jargon I heard on the > radio: > > "We're in a liquid precipitation situation."
Presumably as opposed to solid precipitation, such as hail, sleet, snow, or animals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raining_animals
Signature
Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |Sorry, captain. Convenient 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |technobabble levels are dangerously Palo Alto, CA 94304 |low.
kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
MC
02 Jul 2009 03:26
I just remembered a classic bit of weather jargon I heard on the radio:
"We're in a liquid precipitation situation."
Signature
"Fiction writing is great. You can make up almost anything." - Ivana Trump
Jerry Friedman
02 Jul 2009 03:22
> Robert Bannister filted: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > You mean you don't have a permanent "heat island" keeping the wet at bay?...r
Except when you have four inches in an hour?
This reminds me that I recently talked with a woman who had just moved from Arizona to Santa Fe. She said she used to get depressed in spring because summer was coming.
Now she'd be cheering up, I suppose, with the "monsoon" coming, except that we've had a weird year. Monsoon in June is crooned to the same tune.
-- Jerry Friedman
R H Draney
02 Jul 2009 01:37
Robert Bannister filted:
>> Now of course they have satellites and ground Doppler weather radars >> and know all about El Nino and everything and they still can't [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >on his radar screen when we have clear skies. When the rain never >reaches our shores, however, they never explain why.
You mean you don't have a permanent "heat island" keeping the wet at bay?...r
Signature
A pessimist sees the glass as half empty. An optometrist asks whether you see the glass more full like this?...or like this?
Robert Bannister
02 Jul 2009 00:15
> Now of course they have satellites and ground Doppler weather radars > and know all about El Nino and everything and they still can't > forecast 8 hours in advance. Sometimes you can look out the window > and see that the forecast is already wrong.
I like it when the forecaster tells us he can see several thunderstorms on his radar screen when we have clear skies. When the rain never reaches our shores, however, they never explain why.
Signature
Rob Bannister
John Varela
01 Jul 2009 17:24
> The TV weather forecaster says, "There's a 70 per cent chance of rain > this evening." > > It sounds authoritative and scientific, but what does it actually mean?
It's one of those mysteries of life.
Some 30 years ago when the Weather Bureau (I think it was still called the Weather Bureau at that time) first started giving those percentages, I asked a cow orker who had a degree in meteorology what that meant. He hadn't actually worked as a meteorologist for at least a decade, so he didn't know, but supposed that if a forecaster had ten indicators that suggest rain, and four of the indicators say "yes" and six of them say "no", then the probability of rain would be 40%.
Now of course they have satellites and ground Doppler weather radars and know all about El Nino and everything and they still can't forecast 8 hours in advance. Sometimes you can look out the window and see that the forecast is already wrong.
Signature
John Varela Trade NEWlamps for OLDlamps for email
MC
01 Jul 2009 12:35
The TV weather forecaster says, "There's a 70 per cent chance of rain this evening."
It sounds authoritative and scientific, but what does it actually mean?
Signature
"Fiction writing is great. You can make up almost anything." - Ivana Trump