Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Office update for Windows29 Jan 2004 06:52 GMT4
There's an MS technical bulletin on new updates to Office 2003. Anyone who
has such items should go to WindowsUpdate (where they will not be shown)
and then select Office Update, as usual. These did not affect Word 2002.
Is there really such a word as "amortization"29 Jan 2004 05:18 GMT38
I decided to use the http://www-lexikon.nada.kth.se/skolverket/sve-eng.shtml
web page to look up the Swedish / Norwegian word "amortering" to English. An
"amortering" is what you get from the bank when you buy a house. The bank
lends you the money and you pay back interest for the ...
"More than" versus "Less than"29 Jan 2004 03:43 GMT5
How do you interpret the meaning of "more than" and "less than"? If
someone says "more than 30", does it mean a value greater than 30 (30
excluded) or a value greater than 30 (30 included)? If someone says
"less than 30", does it mean a value smaller than 30 (30 excluded)?
Homeland Security29 Jan 2004 03:16 GMT9
The phrase "homeland security" has become prominent since 9/11. The United
States government, in the National Strategy for Homeland Security, defines the
phrase as "a concerted national effort to prevent terrorist attacks within the
United States, reduce America's vulnerability to ...
raisin secs29 Jan 2004 01:48 GMT265
I've noticed that English tends to have separate nouns for objects,
such as, "grapes" and "raisins" whereas French only differentiates
between "raisins"
ans "raisims secs."  Is there any reason for this?
'Piece' as Adjective.28 Jan 2004 22:36 GMT6
I am using piece in a sentence as an adjective; is this permissable?
"To understand the substance of Foreign Policy it is necessary to
recognize the broad, expansive elements of the practice as well as the
piece elements."
"More Than" versus 'Less Than"28 Jan 2004 22:27 GMT16
How do you interpret the meaning of "more than" and "less than"? If
someone says "more than 30", does it mean a value greater than 30 (30
excluded) or a value greater than 30 (30 included)? If someone says
"less than 30", does it mean a value smaller than 30 (30 excluded)?
Interesting article from the AUE's first day:28 Jan 2004 19:11 GMT274
"The centre/center question is a good example of why this is difficult.
"Center" is a phonetically correct spelling throughout much of North
America, but in Australia (and I think also in England), the spelling
"centre" is a better representation of the pronunciation.
Donkey Jacket28 Jan 2004 17:14 GMT9
Here's some nostalgia for the Brits, a little education for the
rest of the world:
=====
It can be bought over the counter for about twenty pounds in
Could somebody correct this?28 Jan 2004 16:29 GMT1
This is an self-introduction of my friend.  Could somebody correct this
for him?  Thanks in advance.
==========================================================================
I think I am suitable for the post of Trade Assistant.  I have substantial
Introductory phrases and commas28 Jan 2004 14:30 GMT1
I always seem to struggle with commas...
I know commas should be used to separate introductory phrases from the
main body of the sentence, but it's sometimes not clear to me when a
phrase is introductory or not.  For instance, which of these is
John Kohn for Pres?28 Jan 2004 13:56 GMT1
Presidential hopeful John Kerry's grandfather was born to a Jewish
family in a small town in the Czech Republic as *Fritz Kohn*.  He
changed his name to *Frederick Kerry* in 1902 and immigrated to the
United States in 1905. (Source: a Brandeis-U-linked page.)
get some way on28 Jan 2004 08:05 GMT13
Let me ask a question about the following sentence from a novel.
"We'll get some way on. The ship will ride more easily on a bow sea."
(p142, Tom Clancy)
context: The speaker here is commanding the ship.
Re: Could it be . . .   (again)   attn: Mike Bandy28 Jan 2004 05:37 GMT2
Back in December I started a thread entitled "Could it be . . ." inquiring
about making a point with a question.  In the thread I said to Mike Bandy:
I want to look into this, but I will not be able to pursue it until the
weekend.
A parsing problem with inversion28 Jan 2004 04:36 GMT4
I write the sentence
‘More puzzling is the candidate's views on free trade.'
I parse the subject of the sentence to be the gerund ‘puzzling' (or
‘more puzzling'); the subject is singular, and therefore so is the
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.