| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| When you tell someone to GET f.cked | 21 Nov 2006 10:41 GMT | 3 |
When you tell someone to get f.cked, because you are angry at them, do you really want them to go fornicate with someone? If so, why are you yelling at them? You are telling them to do something pleasurable, unless they are some sort of weirdo that hates having sexual
|
| My trip to the Baseball Hall of Fame | 21 Nov 2006 06:59 GMT | 5 |
This past Thursday I went on a field trip with the rest of my residential unit at Broome Developmental Center. We went to Cooperstown, NY (located about 60 miles from Binghamton), to the National Baseball Hall of Fame! We saw lots of interesting things
|
| As he mustered its modest front ... | 21 Nov 2006 06:11 GMT | 21 |
I've no idea what "mustered" means here. It seems to be a less common usage. ------- Madame Olenska's own dwelling was redeemed from the same appearance
|
| Full circle? | 21 Nov 2006 04:16 GMT | 17 |
When the telephone became commonplace, people bewailed the passing of the art of letter-writing. Now that writing has returned in the of e-mail, the complaint is that people don't talk any more! David
|
| Completely OT: strange spam | 21 Nov 2006 04:05 GMT | 29 |
Sorry to be so OT, but, as others have said in comparable circs, I trust people here for sensible answers. I make this email address public, so it gets the spam. I've just received a spam mail not only dated 26 January 2000, but sorted
|
| Plural or singular | 21 Nov 2006 03:48 GMT | 7 |
What does "freak-out" and "pull-up" mean? Or Should I say What do "freak-out" and "pull-up" mean? Which one is correct?
|
| You may/can be sure, sir | 21 Nov 2006 03:40 GMT | 4 |
Are: "You may be sure" "You can be sure" equally justified in the following contexts (the 2nd one is BrE)?
|
| "Liggers" -- early uses [was: er, something else] | 21 Nov 2006 00:03 GMT | 2 |
I've found a couple more citations that I think are better than the current OED ones, since they either predate or are from much better sources than the OED ones: It turns out I was right about both the earlier date and the likely
|
| Prioritize | 21 Nov 2006 00:00 GMT | 10 |
PRIORITIZE Instead of a definition, I understand the term to mean the action of assesment of order of importance, according to certain criterion, or even several criteria. But when I speak to people with whom I work, the term is
|
| "The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Mathematics" -- ???? | 20 Nov 2006 22:12 GMT | 15 |
Hi, is there a math equivalent of the wonderful "Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language" -- for mathematics?? I mean, anything like it, by anyone? I read that all the mathematics currently known could fit 100K books...and I'm wondering why there
|
| Mos def. | 20 Nov 2006 20:18 GMT | 4 |
Is the meaning of "Mos def." at the end of the news article excerpted below, "Most definitely?" http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061024/LIVING/610240314/-1/ ZONES04 [excerpt]
|
| I say "iyther... " | 20 Nov 2006 17:53 GMT | 6 |
It seemed to me that the split between people who pronounced "either" as "iyther" or "eether" was about 50/50. Now it seems that everyone, especially on radio and TV, says "eether". Why is that ? David
|
| Cut the line | 20 Nov 2006 17:52 GMT | 30 |
Are these right? (1) I was trying to tell you the truth but you cut the line (i.e. hang up the phone). (2) I was trying to call last night. When phone just rang once, you cut the
|
| Is there no limit to the stupidity prevalent in usenet? | 20 Nov 2006 14:44 GMT | 21 |
Seen in another group
> Xref: news comp.sys.mac.advocacy:1321084 > Path: > news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!postnews.google.com!f16g2 |
| Reasons that would tell with both of them | 20 Nov 2006 14:15 GMT | 7 |
I wonder what is the meaning of "to tell with somebody" in the "reasons that would tell with both of them?" Could it be "reasons that would reveal themselves in both of them?" ------
|