| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Alphabet Juice | 09 Jan 2009 18:43 GMT | 2 |
Has anyone else seen Roy Blount's fascinating new book, "Alphabet Juice"? He seems to cover most of the last years' discussions in this group and describes "The Energies, Gists, and Spirits of Letter, Words, and Combinations Thereof: Their Roots, Bones, Innards, Piths, Pips and
|
| All the Tea in China | 09 Jan 2009 16:39 GMT | 3 |
They tell you one shouldn't use cliches such as "all the tea in China," but suppose your story takes place in the early 18th century when the East Indian company was just beginning its massive exportation of China Tea? The expression "all the tea in china" would not have been a ...
|
| Whose and Which | 09 Jan 2009 15:44 GMT | 33 |
I'm becoming annoyed at the use of "whose" for inanimate objects and animals. "The computer, whose hard drive had just died...." is an example. To me, "who" refers to a person and "which" refers to non- persons. So, the correct construction would be "The computer, which
|
| A headline on Headlines | 09 Jan 2009 15:29 GMT | 18 |
Not long ago we had a thread (under the misleading subject line "Settle an argument about prepositional phrases") about whether the expression "one in four businesses" was to be construed as singular or plural. Some people disagreed with others.
|
| Authentic US w.nker spotted | 09 Jan 2009 14:12 GMT | 16 |
Sorry, I just couldn't resist the subject. Not having Marius' elevated tastes, I'm currently reading Dean Koontz (I remember him when he had an 'R')'s "The Husband". On page 7 I find "What happened was some w.nker, not even a surfer, just a wannabe
|
| Dennis Hammes aka scrawlmark@arvig.net has died... | 08 Jan 2009 20:57 GMT | 2 |
Todd, I am stunned by this news, too. Had you not the wisdom to put Dennis in the subject, it might have stayed in my suspect mail filter! Thank you for telling me. I will relay to the
|
| Shall/have | 08 Jan 2009 20:16 GMT | 7 |
Any reasons for the "shall/will" pair here? Is it mandatory, or can we swap them? ------ [Naphta talking]
|
| a sentence | 08 Jan 2009 19:57 GMT | 5 |
People, The pharagraph below will appear on a web questionnaire just before a question appears. I have the following requests:
|
| Meaning of "initializing" | 08 Jan 2009 16:08 GMT | 16 |
Could anyone please tell me the meaning of "initializing" in the following sentence: "World map is initializing". The text is about online airline ticketing.
|
| Very little agitates academia more these days than ... | 08 Jan 2009 14:05 GMT | 8 |
I was reading "The Returning of the Melting Pot" by Arthur Schlesinger. The article is available on this page: http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0101/article_8.shtml
|
| In the service of the cure | 08 Jan 2009 12:11 GMT | 9 |
Is this "In the service of the cure" an idiom, used about medical treatments? -------
|
| Which form of citation is correct? | 08 Jan 2009 10:35 GMT | 2 |
Which form of citation is correct? According to Wood and Kroger (2000: 117), “discourse patterns may be ...... ” OR
|
| Depression sinks the limerick? | 08 Jan 2009 03:48 GMT | 2 |
Whither goest the limerick? Most dictionaries have the poetic form as humorous – but here it is, after Madoff made off with the life savings of a suicide. as a dirge: --
|
| did whining bout lower case writing without the caps lock disappear with mobile phones? | 08 Jan 2009 03:35 GMT | 1 |
cuz a decade ago usenet was infested with grammar learnt at school whinoes...
|
| abbreviation for "chapters" | 08 Jan 2009 00:16 GMT | 15 |
"ch." is fine for the singular. But how about the plural? "chh."? or "chs."? The only reason why I would even remotely consider the possibility of the first option is by analogy with the plural abbreviation for pages, "pp," although "chs." does look more normal.
|