| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Who of us / Which of us - the same meaning? | 28 Feb 2004 06:40 GMT | 2 |
I was tought to use 'who' for persons and 'which' or 'that' for animals and things. The man who ate his bread. The dog which (that) ate his dog food.
|
| For native English speakers... | 27 Feb 2004 19:48 GMT | 3 |
This is a sample text for anyone to correct and comment on. But I specially ask native English speakers to please check it out, and tell me if my written English is good enough as that of a person whose mother tongue is English. This is because I am planning to do English
|
| shake a crush | 26 Feb 2004 19:16 GMT | 8 |
Hi folks :-) Yesterday I fond the following sentance and I'm not able to translate it. "he's unable to shake a crush on the kid down the street"
|
| Willie-nilly | 24 Feb 2004 11:23 GMT | 7 |
"Willie-nilly I will go decreasing ..." Please tell me what willie-nilly means. Should it be written otherwise? Is it a much used expression? Please elaborate. Thanks. M.R.
|
| A noun as an adjective? | 24 Feb 2004 10:43 GMT | 5 |
"In English we use many nouns as adjectives. Car, for example, is a noun. But we talk about car dealers, car lots, car problems, and car payments. In those cases car is being used as an adjective". What do you think of that statement that I just saw in an other forum? Is
|
| Pronoun placement - "Jack and we. . ." | 24 Feb 2004 03:26 GMT | 6 |
While I know it is common usage to place I, we, me and us after another noun or pronoun in a sentence, I wonder if it is ever acceptable not to do so. For example, it sounds better to me to say, "We and Jack went to the movies," than to say "Jack and we went to the
|
| A take-note debate | 23 Feb 2004 08:30 GMT | 3 |
If you say that they held a "take-note" debate, what do you mean exactly by "a take-note debate"? Thanks, once again. M.R.
|
| it's all in the shoes | 22 Feb 2004 22:28 GMT | 7 |
Here is the full context:"The precious metals and base metals sectors look good in terms of long term stock positions; if you feel like going short, it's all in the shoes says Leeward Hedge Funds Portfolio Manager Kyle McKay".
|
| q | 22 Feb 2004 09:06 GMT | 5 |
|
| how do you say? | 22 Feb 2004 08:59 GMT | 9 |
1. Fresh oil has a 6 months maturing process, at least, for gaining those features. or Fresh oil has a 6 months maturing process, at least, to gain those features. 2. Tell me when do you finish your work to go with you to the party or Tell me when do you finish your work for going ...
|
| bad as they come | 22 Feb 2004 04:01 GMT | 4 |
I've thought about this sentence since last night but still haven't figured out or even guessed what it means. It appeared in a conversation like this: A: Bad day?
|
| Looking for a corpus of English.. | 21 Feb 2004 13:07 GMT | 6 |
I am doing a dissertation which requires me to use a wide corpus of English. I have looked at the BNC and the Bank of English but the costs are prohibitive as I am funding this myself. Has anyone any idea where I might get a corpus of a few million
|
| the difference between thing and stuff? | 19 Feb 2004 11:09 GMT | 3 |
hi, i'd like to know the differences between them. thanks
|
| keep their rifles undertheir beds | 18 Feb 2004 12:01 GMT | 3 |
hi, all, I have come across this passage: "Now that it is surrounded by EU countries on all sides, Switzerland feels less need to be armed to the teeth to repel potential invaders.
|
| Looking for a corpus of English... | 18 Feb 2004 11:02 GMT | 1 |
I am doing a dissertation which requires me to use a wide corpus of English. I have looked at the BNC and the Bank of English but the costs are prohibitive as I am funding this myself. Has anyone any idea where I might get a corpus of a few million
|